Vacilación ante la vacuna contra el covid-19 en Estados Unidos de América
Un estudio etnográfico digital
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15530967 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rosalynn Adeline Vega, Rosalynn Vega (0000-0003-4520-4114, Centro de Investigación y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Pages | e4541-e4541 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-26 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Salud Colectiva (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1669-2381 • E-ISSN: 1851-8265 |
| Publisher | Instituto de Salud Colectiva, Universidad Nacional de Lanús (PUBLISHER • AR) |
| DOI | 10.18294/sc.2024.4541 |
| PMID | 38733976 |
| OpenAlex | W4393191685 |
| Language | ES |
| References cited | 43 |
Following the authorization the use of COVID-19 vaccines in babies age six months through children four years old in the United States, some individuals (parents, pediatricians, and communicators) framed COVID-19 vaccination as an issue of access, while many others expressed hesitancy and some resisted recommendations from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In this context, this study aimed to explore: 1) divergent reactions to the authorization of COVID-19 vaccine use in children aged six months to four years; and 2) opposing logics underlying attitudes towards pro-vaccination, anti-vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy regarding COVID-19 vaccines. To achieve this, a digital ethnography was conducted, involving monitoring of 5,700 reactions to a series of eight infographics published on social media by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and participant observation in an online focus group over a one-year period, from December 2021 to December 2022, consisting of 18 mothers. The findings suggest that healthcare professionals should consider different notions of "risk" when interacting with patients, especially those who are hesitant to vaccinate
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Disease · Humanities · Infectious disease (medical specialty · Political science · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Discipline and Practice
Virtual Ethnography
Vaccine Hesitancy
Virtual Ethnography
Understanding the perceived logic of care by vaccine-hesitant and vaccine-refusing parents
Communicating with parents about vaccination
Making Virtual Worlds
Play Between Worlds
Framing Childhood Vaccination in the United States
Taking vaccine regret and hesitancy seriously. The role of truth, conspiracy theories, gender relations and trust in the HPV immunisation programmes in Ireland
Social and cultural construction processes involved in HPV vaccine hesitancy among Chinese women
Vaccines and vitriol
Ethnography and the digital fields of social media
To EHB 1638 or Not to EHB 1638? For Immunization Policymakers, That Is the Question
The Politics of Covid Vaccine Hesitancy and Opposition
Social Media Ethnography
The Factors That Promote Vaccine Hesitancy, Rejection, or Delay in Parents
Nature Does Things Well, Why Should We Interfere
Theorizing (Vaccine) Refusal
Message Received
The Field Site as a Network
Getting it right
Digital Methods for Ethnography
From iatrogenesis to vaccine skepticism
Information Curation among Vaccine Cautious Parents
| Highly cited | No |
|---|