Evaluation of programs to improve complementary feeding in infants and young children

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15536985
AutoresEdward A Frongillo (0000-0002-8265-9815, University of South Carolina, autor de correspondencia)
Año2017
Volumen13
NúmeroS2
Fecha de publicación2017-10-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaMaternal and Child Nutrition (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1740-8695 • E-ISSN: 1740-8709
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/mcn.12436
PMID29032620
OpenAlexW2761258601
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas25

Evaluation of complementary feeding programs is needed to enhance knowledge on what works, to document responsible use of resources, and for advocacy. Evaluation is done during program conceptualization and design, implementation, and determination of effectiveness. This paper explains the role of evaluation in the advancement of complementary feeding programs, presenting concepts and methods and illustrating them through examples. Planning and investments for evaluations should occur from the beginning of the project life cycle. Essential to evaluation is articulation of a program theory on how change would occur and what program actions are required for change. Analysis of program impact pathways makes explicit the dynamic connections in the program theory and accounts for contextual factors that could influence program effectiveness. Evaluating implementation functioning is done through addressing questions about needs, coverage, provision, and utilization using information obtained from process evaluation, operations research, and monitoring. Evaluating effectiveness is done through assessing impact, efficiency, coverage, process, and causality. Plausibility designs ask whether the program seemed to have an effect above and beyond external influences, often using a nonrandomized control group and baseline and end line measures. Probability designs ask whether there was an effect using a randomized control group. Evaluations may not be able to use randomization, particularly for programs implemented at a large scale. Plausibility designs, innovative designs, or innovative combinations of designs sometimes are best able to provide useful information. Further work is needed to develop practical designs for evaluation of large-scale country programs on complementary feeding

Ask price · Baseline (sea · Conceptualization · Control (management · Flexibility (engineering · Management science · Process (computing · Process management · Program Design Language · Program evaluation · Risk analysis (engineering · Scale (ratio · Software engineering · Theory of change · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Computer Science · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Medicine · Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare · Artificial Intelligence