The new ‘diaspora trap’ framework
Explaining return migration from South Africa to Zimbabwe beyond the ‘failure-success’ framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15538629 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Divane Nzima (0000-0003-1633-370X, University of Fort Hare, corresponding author), Philani Moyo (0000-0002-9089-7565, University of Fort Hare) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 355-370 |
| Publication date | 2017-09-06 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | MIGRATION LETTERS (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1741-8984 • E-ISSN: 1741-8992 |
| Publisher | Dewspublication (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.33182/ml.v14i3.349 |
| OpenAlex | W2766185811 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
This article explores how South Africa-based Zimbabwean skilled migrants are dissuaded from returning home permanently. The study was conceptualised against the background that return migration has often been explained based on migrant failure or success in the host country. This failure-success dichotomy stems from the neo-classical economics theory of migration, the new economics of labour migration and the structuralist approach to return migration. Using a qualitative methodological approach, this article challenges the failure-success theoretical position through an exploration of socio-economic factors in Zimbabwe and South Africa that deter permanent return migration. The article contributes to return migration theorising by introducing a new ‘diaspora trap’ framework which argues that permanent settlement is not always voluntary. Central to this involuntary permanent settlement is the social construction of migrants as successful in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwean skilled migrants are thus entrapped in South Africa because of failure to live up to the ‘success social construct,’ and their inability to mitigate adversities in the host country
Development economics · Diaspora · Economics · Political science · Position (finance · Settlement (finance · Sociology · Diaspora, migration, transnational identity · Gender Studies · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy · Finance
Intergenerational Kinship Networks of Support Within Transnational Families in the era of Covid-19 in the South Africa–Zimbabwe Migration Corridor
Choosing between environmental conservation and survival
Gender and the return migration process
Stay away or stay in? Exploring settlement decisions of economic migrants and war refugees from Ukraine in the structural approach framework
Going back home to my family and community’
Disgraceful return
| Citations per year | 1.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |