Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sustainability reporting regulations at the crossroads. A critical note on the EU Omnibus

Bibliographic Data

ID15538802
AuthorsPatrick Velte (0000-0001-5960-8449, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-23
Publication date2026-02-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Perspectives on International Business (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1742-2043 • E-ISSN: 1758-6062
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/cpoib-06-2025-0142
OpenAlexW7128522082
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited59

Purpose This study aims to focus on European Union (EU) regulations on sustainability reporting, which are currently equated with a build-up of bureaucracy, although potential chances of reporting for firms and stakeholders are rarely discussed. Design/methodology/approach This study includes a normative overview of the EU Omnibus with its major amendments of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Taxonomy Regulation. Then, this paper reviews prior empirical research on the former Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), Taxonomy Regulation and CSRD, as well as their impact on corporate financial and sustainability outputs, through the lens of stakeholder and legitimacy theories. Finally, a critical assessment is made of the limitations of previous studies, the legitimacy crisis of the EU Commission and the implications for corporate sustainability transformation. Findings The sustainability reporting amendments of the EU Omnibus contrast with legitimacy and stakeholder theories, endanger the goals of the EU Green Deal project, lead to a massive legitimacy crisis of the EU Commission and reduce the possibility that corporate sustainability will go beyond the achievement of specific compliance levels. As regards EU sustainability reporting, the new thresholds for firms are a political compromise, achieved by lobbyism that lacks either empirical proven legitimacy or stakeholder inclusion. In view of the heterogeneous empirical results regarding the information value of NFRD reporting, the greater regulatory pressure of the CSRD and Taxonomy Regulation before the introduction of the EU Omnibus was justified. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study of the EU Omnibus on sustainability reporting to connect the normative, theoretical and empirical aspects of the NFRD, CSRD and Taxonomy Regulation and critically reflect on their negative consequences for corporate sustainability

Commission · Directive · European union · Integrated reporting · Legitimacy · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Sustainability organizations · Sustainability reporting · Corporate Law and Human Rights · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Environmental Policies and Emissions

  • The changing shape of climate technofixes

    Open Access•Sean Low•Earth System Governance•2026

  • Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting

    Open Access•Hans Bonde Christensen, Luzi Hail et al.•Review of Accounting Studies•2021

  • The information content of corporate social responsibility disclosure in Europe

    Open Access•Stéphanie Mittelbach-Hörmanseder, Stéphanie Mittelbach‐Hörmanseder et al.•European Accounting Review•2021

  • Organizational Legitimacy

    John B Dowling, John Dowling et al.•The Pacific Sociological Review•1975

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae