The role of institutional and stakeholder interaction in integrated reporting policy development

Bibliographic Data

ID15539183
AuthorsRania AbuRaya (0000-0002-8479-6872, Assiut University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume20
Issue1
Pages121-152
Publication date2023-12-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Perspectives on International Business (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1742-2043 • E-ISSN: 1758-6062
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/cpoib-12-2021-0110
OpenAlexW4390290897
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited44

Purpose This study aims to investigate the role of institutional and stakeholder interaction in the development of integrated reporting policy by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). It helps advance the theory of integrated reporting and offers insights into its fundamental concepts and relevant issues. Design/methodology/approach A flexible pattern-matching qualitative research approach is used and an analytical framework of integrated reporting historical foundations and conceptual background is developed. An IIRC case analysis is conducted by using a chronological content analysis of the International Integrated Reporting Framework and related initiatives and publications for integrated reporting policy pronouncements. Findings Institutional and stakeholder pressures within both the organization’s macro and micro contexts have played an effective role in transforming corporate reporting practices. In an integrated reporting context, institutional forces of normative and mimetic isomorphism seem to have more influence on organizations than coercive pressures, where stakeholder pressures with limited official power derive influence from their legitimacy while urgency is evidently implied. Findings indicate that integrated reporting policy has emerged analogously with the institutional environment and stakeholders’ expectations. The distinct nature of integrated reporting has caused a paradigm shift from silo thinking of wealth creation to integrated thinking of value creation. Research limitations/implications This is an exploratory study that does not consider different prominent integrated reporting models. It has important implications for policymakers in articulating the integration of financial and nonfinancial metrics for reporting overall corporate performance. It can help academics build on integrated reporting foundations for conducting future research and assist practitioners in operationalizing integrated reporting policy into practice. Moreover, it has potential prospects for international business in developing integrated reporting policies and strategies aimed at creating mutual value in specific international contexts. Originality/value Integrated reporting represents a new internationally developing reporting trend with distinct reporting features and foundations for value creation. The study provides considerable addition to emerging research into the growing awareness of integrated reporting policy, develops a conceptual model of institutional and stakeholder interaction and theorizes on such interplay, identifies the potential influences under which integrated reporting is likely to occur and offers key insights into integrated reporting policy. Hence, it contributes to the ongoing global challenge of promoting the reporting transition to integrated reporting and its perceived future endorsement

Business · Context (archaeology · Corporate social responsibility · Economics · Institutional theory · Integrated reporting · Knowledge management · Legitimacy · Management · Normative · Operationalization · Political science · Public relations · Stakeholder · Stakeholder analysis · Stakeholder engagement · Sustainability · Sustainability reporting · Accounting and Organizational Management · Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Tools

Open DOI