Hesitance towards voluntary medical male circumcision in Lesotho
Reconfiguring global health governance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15540331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicola Bulled (0000-0002-9699-3937, University of Connecticut, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 5-6 |
| Pages | 757-772 |
| Publication date | 2014-10-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-1692 • E-ISSN: 1744-1706 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17441692.2014.962559 |
| PMID | 25300786 |
| OpenAlex | W2083432102 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 65 |
Drawing on work examining HIV prevention initiatives in Lesotho, this paper considers the hesitation of national state actors towards the new strategy for HIV prevention – voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). Lesotho offers a representative case study on global health governance, given the country's high HIV burden and heavy dependence on foreign donor nations to implement local HIV prevention initiatives. In this paper, I use the case of VMMC opposition in Lesotho to examine how the new era of ‘partnerships’ has shifted the architecture of contemporary global health, specifically considering how global agreements are translated or negotiated into local practice. I argue that Lesotho's domestic policy-makers, in employing national statistics to assess if VMMC is an effective approach to addressing the local epidemic, are asserting a claim of expertise. In doing so, they challenge the traditional structures of global health politics, which have largely been managed by experts and funders from and in the global North. I explore the development of global VMMC policy, what drives Lesotho's resistance to comply, and consider the impact renegotiation efforts may have on future global health architecture
Aid effectiveness · Corporate governance · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Global governance · Global health · Health care · Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV · Management · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Work (physics · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues · Engineering · Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues · Genital Health and Disease · Medicine · Public Administration
Social models of HIV risk among young adults in Lesotho
Medically, Traditionally, and Dually Circumcised Men in Lesotho
Making voluntary medical male circumcision a viable HIV prevention strategy in high-prevalence countries by engaging the traditional sector
Public health’s social contract
Promoting male circumcision as HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa
East African doctors
Evidence, ethos, and experiment
Disease, Medicine, and Empire
Life Exposed
Communicating Social Change
Scrambling for Africa
What Led to the Nigerian Boycott of the Polio Vaccination Campaign?
Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya
Viral Load and Heterosexual Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa
Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trial of Male Circumcision for Reduction of HIV Infection Risk
Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection among African Women
Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda
In the Name of Global Health
Globalization and Culture
Globalization and Culture
Stories in the Time of Cholera
Making sense of global health governance
Long-term population effect of male circumcision in generalised HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa
Acceptability of Male Circumcision for Prevention of HIV Infection in Malawi
Boys will be boys’
International Public Health
New lives for old
(Re)distribution of blame
Dr. Wouter Basson, Americans, and Wild Beasts
Health reporting as political reporting
Cutting Tradition
Just a Snip
Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention
The politics of Aids
Pharmaceuticalization
Why Nation-States and Journalists Can't Teach People to Be Healthy
Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature
Social theory and globalization
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,45 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2020 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |