University patenting and licensing practices in the United Kingdom during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15540398 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarai Keestra (0000-0002-6368-0977, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, corresponding author), Florence Rodgers (0000-0001-6627-1143, Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust), Rhiannon Osborne (0000-0002-3301-2783, University of Cambridge), Sabrina Wimmer (0000-0003-3040-7242, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 641-651 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-1692 • E-ISSN: 1744-1706 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17441692.2022.2049842 |
| OpenAlex | W4220874003 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 15 |
Universities' decisions during technology transfer may affect affordability, accessibility, and availability of COVID-19 health technologies downstream. We investigated measures taken by the top 35 publicly funded UK universities to ensure global equitable access to COVID-19 health technologies between January and end of October 2020. We sent Freedom Of Information (FOI) requests and analysed universities’ websites, to (i) assess institutional strategies on the patenting and licensing of COVID-19-related health technologies, (ii) identify all COVID-19-related health technologies licensed or patented and (iii) record whether universities engaged with the Open COVID pledge, COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP), or Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) COVID-19 licensing guidelines during the time period assessed. Except for the Universities of Oxford and Edinburgh, UK universities did not update their institutional strategies during the first year of the pandemic. Nine universities licensed 22 COVID-19 health technologies. Imperial College London disclosed ten patents relevant to COVID-19. No UK universities participated in the Open COVID Pledge or C-TAP, but discussions were ongoing in autumn 2020. The University of Bristol endorsed the AUTM guidelines. Despite important COVID-19 health technologies being developed by UK universities, our findings suggest minimal engagement with measures that may promote equitable access downstream. We suggest universities review their technology transfer policies and implement global equitable access strategies for COVID-19 health technologies. We furthermore propose that public and charitable funders can play a larger role in encouraging universities to adopt such practices by making access and transparency clauses a mandatory condition for receiving public funds for research
Best practice · Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Economic growth · Economics · Emerging technologies · Pandemic · Pledge · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Transparency (behavior · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Structural violence and the biomedical innovation system
Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine
Global equitable access to vaccines, medicines and diagnostics for Covid-19
Making a Covid-19 vaccine that works for everyone
Defining equity in health
A global database of Covid-19 vaccinations
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |