Re-visioning evidence
Reflections on the recent controversy around gender selective abortion in the UK
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15540407 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Unnithan (0000-0002-7649-7282, University of Sussex, corresponding author), Sylvie Dubuc (0000-0002-2622-6169, Oxford Policy Management) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 742-753 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-1692 • E-ISSN: 1744-1706 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17441692.2017.1346694 |
| PMID | 28705073 |
| OpenAlex | W2735509767 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 28 |
Reports in the British media over the last 4 years have highlighted the schisms and contestations that have accompanied the reports of gender selective abortions amongst British Asian families. The position that sex-selection may be within the terms of the 1967 Abortion Act has particularly sparked controversy amongst abortion campaigners and politicians but equally among medical practitioners and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service who have hitherto tended to stay clear of such debates. In what ways has the controversy around gender-based abortion led to new framings of the entitlement to service provision and new ways of thinking about evidence in the context of reproductive rights? We reflect on these issues drawing on critiques of what constitutes best evidence, contested notions of reproductive rights and reproductive governance, comparative work in India and China as well as our involvement with different groups of campaigners including British South Asian NGOs. The aim of the paper is to situate the medical and legal provision of abortion services in Britain within current discursive practices around gender equality, ethnicity, reproductive autonomy, probable and plausible evidence, and policies of health reform
Abortion · Autonomy · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Entitlement (fair division · Geography · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Reproductive health · Reproductive justice · Reproductive rights · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Gender Studies · Global Maternal and Child Health · Law · Reproductive Health and Contraception
Sex selection and global gender justice
Between reproductive rights and sex selection in New Zealand’s abortion reforms
Evidence of Decreasing Prenatal Sex-Selection Practice in a Context of Liberal Abortion Rights
Synthesizing the Global English-Language Abortion Narrative
But It's Not That They Don't Love Their Girls
Arbitrating Abortion
Son-biased sex ratios in the 2000 United States Census
Technological Fix
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Why is Son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? a cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea
Limits of state intervention in sex-selective abortion
Female selective abortion – beyond ‘culture’
Navigating New Socio-Demographic Landscapes
"Cultural versus Biological Factors in Explaining Asia's "Missing Women
Consequences of Son Preference in a Low-Fertility Society
Sex-Selective Abortions in India
An Increase in the Sex Ratio of Births to India-born Mothers in England and Wales
There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons
Fertility Decline and Increased Manifestation of Sex Bias in India
Son Preference and the Persistence of Culture
Evidence for an Incipient Decline in Numbers of Missing Girls in China and India
Negotiating reproductive rights
Female-Selective Abortion in Asia
Reproductive governance in Latin America
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |