Public-private partnering as a modus operandi

Explaining the Gates Foundation’s approach to global health governance

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15540669
AutoresMichael Stevenson (0000-0003-3720-1888, University of Waterloo, autor de correspondencia), Jeremy Youde (0000-0002-5449-1840, University of Minnesota, Duluth)
Año2020
Volumen16
Número3
Páginas401-414
Fecha de publicación2020-08-07
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGlobal Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1744-1692 • E-ISSN: 1744-1706
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17441692.2020.1801790
PMID32762617
OpenAlexW3047892035
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas10
Referencias citadas54

In its first decade, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) focused much of its efforts on enabling the establishment of transnational public-private partnerships (PPPs) oriented towards increasing low-income country (LIC) access to essential health technologies. Critics have argued these efforts further enriched already profitable firms which long ignored the needs of populations with limited purchasing power, while lessening political will to invest in urgently needed public sector capacity to produce essential health technologies independently of market pressures. Missing from these critical analyses were the perspectives of those shaping BMGF's global health programming. Drawing on interviews with senior BMGF staff and external affiliates undertaken between 2010 and 2012, this article seeks to address this gap. We argue that BMGF's embrace of PPPs was adopted out of the belief that neither public agencies nor industry were capable of providing LICs with essential health technologies autonomously, and that their conflicting mandates required an honest broker to initiate and sustain collaboration between the two sectors. The Foundation's comparative advantage in global health governance was thus seen by those informing its work, as its capacity to negotiate such partnerships, which we argue has also been the basis of its agenda-setting influence in this domain

Business · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Foundation (evidence · General partnership · Global governance · Global health · Health care · Management · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Private sector · Public health · Public relations · Public sector · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · International Development and Aid · Medicine · Finance