Understanding media publics and the antimicrobial resistance crisis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15540947 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark D M Davis (0000-0003-4075-0466, Monash University, corresponding author), A Whittaker (0000-0002-2616-9651, Monash University), Mia Lindgren (0000-0002-4937-6194, Monash University), Monika Djerf-Pierre (0000-0001-7754-0636, University of Gothenburg), L Manderson (0000-0002-7883-1790, University of the Witwatersrand), Paul Flowers (0000-0001-6239-5616, Glasgow Caledonian University) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1158-1168 |
| Publication date | 2017-06-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-1692 • E-ISSN: 1744-1706 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17441692.2017.1336248 |
| PMID | 28594309 |
| OpenAlex | W2623177779 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 43 |
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) imperils health for people across the world. This enormous challenge is being met with the rationalisation of prescription, dispensing and consumption of antimicrobials in clinical settings and in the everyday lives of members of the general population. Individuals need to be reached outside clinical settings to prepare them for the necessary changes to the pharmaceutical management of infections; efforts that depend on media and communications and, therefore, how the AMR message is mediated, received and applied. In 2016, the UK Review on Antimicrobial Resistance called on governments to support intense, worldwide media activity to promote public awareness and to further efforts to rationalise the use of antimicrobial pharmaceuticals. In this article, we consider this communications challenge in light of contemporary currents of thought on media publics, including: the tendency of health communications to cast experts and lay individuals in opposition; the blaming of individuals who appear to 'resist' expert advice; the challenges presented by negative stories of AMR and their circulation in public life, and; the problems of public trust tied to the construction and mediation of expert knowledge on the effective management of AMR
Antibiotic resistance · Antibiotics · Biology · Political science · Politics · Publics · Resistance (ecology · Sociology · Antibiotic Use and Resistance · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Microbiology
Prescribing, care and resistance
Developing and Maintaining Public Trust During and Post-Covid-19
Making sense of “superbugs” on YouTube
New impulses from international development for more comprehensive and balanced public engagement evaluation
The values and principles underpinning community engagement approaches to tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
AMR survivors? Chronic living with antimicrobial resistant infections
The global (health) governance of antimicrobial resistance
Tales of treatment and new perspectives for global health research on antimicrobial resistance
Superbugs” in the Risk Society
What to do with the new molecular publics
Media coverage of antimicrobial resistance in Germany and Switzerland
Sexual transmission of Zika virus on Twitter
Open science, Covid-19, and the news
Fear, trust, and knowledge – understanding Norwegian citizens’ perceptions of antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
The four worlds of politics and administration in the EU
The problem and the productivity of ignorance
Making Health Public
Risk and Blame
Drugs for Life
Pandemics in the Age of Twitter
The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research
Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture
Communicating Health
Life after new media
Risk and Blame
A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication
Understanding critical health literacy
Appealing to fear
From Resilience to Resistance
The pharmaceuticalisation of society? A framework for analysis
Post antibiotic apocalypse
Health and media
Biocommunicability and the Biopolitics of Pandemic Threats
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |