Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A comment to Gobo

The next challenge – from mixed to merged methods

Bibliographic Data

ID15543408
AuthorsChantal Hervieux (0000-0002-0339-6982, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume11
Issue3
Pages195-198
Publication date2016-09-07
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1746-5648 • E-ISSN: 1746-5656
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/qrom-05-2016-1384
OpenAlexW2507711397
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited5

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to further the discussion on points made by Giampietro Gobo, provide additional information on the place of qualitative research in management, and question the space of merged methods. Design/methodology/approach Use a conversational approach as well as a review of qualitative vs quantitative research in three top tier journals for the years 2013-2016 (by a simple count). Findings Quantitative methods remain very much mainstream in management research, yet one finds that for one of the journals, space is evenly shared between qualitative and quantitative methods. Research limitations/implications This is a viewpoint and does not offer a systematic review of all top tier management journals. Originality/value It is hope that with this viewpoint debate as to the space of qualitative research, and merged methods can be stimulated

Data science · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Mainstream · Management science · Originality · Political science · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Quantitative analysis (chemistry · Simple (philosophy · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Accounting and Organizational Management · Computer Science · Engineering · Management and Organizational Studies · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

  • The challenges and outcomes of critical diversity scholarship

    Open Access•Inge Bleijenbergh, Lize Booysen et al.•Qualitative Research in…•2018

  • Methodological fit in management field research

    Amy C Edmondson, Stacy E Mcmanus•Academy of Management Review•2007

  • The next challenge

    Open Access•Giampietro Gobo•Qualitative Research in…•2015

  • Can't Count or Won't Count? Embedding Quantitative Methods in Substantive Sociology Curricula

    Open Access•Malcolm Williams, Luke Sloan et al.•Sociology•2016

  • Does British Sociology Count

    Open Access•Malcolm Williams, Geoff Payne et al.•Sociology•2008

  • Methodological Pluralism in British Sociology

    Open Access•Geoff Payne, Malcolm Williams et al.•Sociology•2004

Citations per year0.13
Citation span2018 - 2018 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae