Flourishing against the odds
Positive deviance case selection and formative influences timeline as methodological tools for tracing resilience in nonprofit organizations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15543802 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Evgeniya Pyatovskaya (0000-0003-0556-0093, Loyola Marymount University Department of Communication Studies, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-22 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1746-5648 • E-ISSN: 1746-5656 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/qrom-07-2025-3116 |
| OpenAlex | W7135065985 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 69 |
Purpose This article advances methodological possibilities for studying organizational resilience by combining Positive Deviance Case Selection (PDCS) with the Formative Influences Timeline (FIT) methods. It responds to the need for approaches that can capture the complexity of resilience as a communicative and materially enacted process in times of crisis. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from a case study of Apex for Youth, a New York–based Asian American nonprofit that thrived after the COVID-19 pandemic, the article demonstrates how PDCS enables researchers to identify organizations that not only endured crisis but flourished under conditions of utter constraint. It also shows how FIT can be used to uncover how resilience is triggered, made sense of and enacted across time and roles. Unlike conventional interviews, FIT surfaces lived rhythms of decision-making, emotional labor and values-work that are often omitted from official accounts or managerialist frames. Findings Taken together, these methods reveal the distributed, embodied and co-constructed nature of resilience in mission-driven work. They illustrate how resilience unfolds not as a linear process but through overlapping and recursive responses to crisis, often shaped by personal commitments and ethical tensions. Originality/value By treating difference and reflexivity as generative of insight in both case selection and data collection, these approaches bridge the gap between research and practice. They offer textured, process and practice-centered perspectives into what holds organizations together when familiar structures fall away and contribute to methodologically imaginative research in organizational communication and resilience
Corporate governance · Flourishing · Formative assessment · Process (computing · Rebranding · Reflexivity · Thriving · Timeline · Vetting · Management and Organizational Studies · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
The power of positive deviance
Organizing resilience as adaptive-transformational tensions
Resilience organizing
The Resilience of Sensation in Urban Planning
“Nobody Knew the Rules”
Pregnancy During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Caring for Patients without Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Resource Scarcity and Humanitarian Social Innovation
‘As resilient as an ironweed
High reliability organizing through an extended crisis
‘We will rise no matter what’
The theory of resilience and relational load
Positive Deviance in Theory and Practice
She takes rest as seriously as working
Managing disruption(s) at work
Organizational resilience and financial performance
Weathering the Storm
Toward the Construct Definition of Positive Deviance
Positive Deviants? How Case Managers Navigate Administrative Evil and Neoliberal Violence When Working with Justice-Involved Young People
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |