Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Addressing integration challenges of high shares of residential solar photovoltaics with battery storage and smart policy designs

Bibliographic Data

ID15544912
AuthorsMarius Schwarz (0000-0001-5366-7333, ETH Zurich, corresponding author), Jan Ossenbrink (0000-0002-4865-4471, ETH Zurich), Christof Knoeri (0000-0003-0355-1011, ETH Zurich), Volker H Hoffmann (0000-0001-5519-7347, ETH Zurich)
Year2018
Volume14
Issue7
Pages074002-074002
Publication date2018-12-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aaf934
OpenAlexW2903658181
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited53

In many countries, the integration of growing shares of residential solar photovoltaics is beginning to challenge existing electricity systems. First, residential solar photovoltaics aggravates sharp system-wide load changes and, in turn, increases the need for fast-ramping generation capacity. Second, it reduces the demand for electricity provision from the grid, causing an increase in electricity prices as grid costs are recovered over smaller volumes of electricity. Battery storage (BS) mitigates the first integration challenge by flattening the system-wide load, but elevates the second by increasing self-consumption behind-themeter. In face of this dilemma, the integration of high shares of residential solar photovoltaics requires policymakers to re-design public support policies. In this article, we develop an agent-based model to simulate California's residential 'solar-plus-storage' market between 2005 and 2030 in four different policy scenarios. By applying a multi-technology, multi-policy approach, we quantify the complex interplay between the diffusion of individual technologies, several interacting policies and systemic challenges. Our results show that California's policy status quo initiated a BS uptake and, in turn, a flattening of the system, but, in the long run, will increase the electricity prices. To avoid this, we outline a policy reorientation-including a gradual phase-out of the prevailing feed-in remuneration and an introduction of fixed charges for owners of solar photovoltaic systems. Our results imply that the policy debate should be re-focused away from a single-technology single-policy perspective towards a system integration perspective. Neglecting this could not only jeopardize the affordability of electricity and climate change mitigation plans, but also put at risk the reliability of the electricity supply system. With investment costs of renewables expected to continue to decrease, this further implies that even countries without public support for renewables are likely to face challenges associated with their integration

Business · Economics · Electrical engineering · Electricity · Environmental economics · Photovoltaic system · Photovoltaics · Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Energy and Environment Impacts · Engineering · Smart Grid Energy Management

  • The impact of utility-scale renewable energy on distribution utility finances in India

    Open Access•Neshwin Rodrigues, Kaveri Iychettira et al.•The Electricity Journal•2026

  • How deployment policies affect innovation in complementary technologies—evidence from the German energy transition

    Open Access•Simon R Sinsel, Jochen Markard et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Driving electrification

    Open Access•Alicia Lerbinger, Georgios Mavromatidis et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change

    Open Access•Felix Creutzig, Peter Agoston et al.•Nature Energy•2017

  • Compulsive policy-making—The evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power

    Open Access•Joern Hoppmann, Joern Huenteler et al.•Research Policy•2014

  • Analysis of complementarities

    Open Access•Jochen Markard, Volker H Hoffmann•Technological Forecasting and…•2016

  • Economic impacts from the promotion of renewable energy technologies

    Open Access•Manuel Frondel, Nolan Ritter et al.•Energy Policy•2010

  • Renewables 2017

    International Energy Agency, Organization for Economic Cooperation and…•Renewables 2017•2017

  • Supporting energy technology deployment while avoiding unintended technological lock-in

    Open Access•Leonore Haelg, Marius Zumwald et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Was it worthwhile? Where have the benefits of rooftop solar photovoltaic generation exceeded the cost

    Open Access•Parth Vaishnav, Nathaniel Horner et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Effective information channels for reducing costs of environmentally- friendly technologies

    Open Access•Varun Rai, Scott A Robinson•Environmental Research Letters•2013

  • Evolution of consumer information preferences with market maturity in solar PV adoption

    Open Access•D Cale Reeves, Varun Rai et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Assessing the evolution of power sector carbon intensity in the United States

    Open Access•Greg Schivley, Inês L Azevedo et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Human impact parameterizations in global hydrological models improve estimates of monthly discharges and hydrological extremes

    Open Access•Ted Veldkamp, Fang Zhao et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Electricity distribution tariffs and distributed generation

    Open Access•Angela Picciariello, Claudio Vergara et al.•Utilities Policy•2015

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae