Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Defining and assessing urban forests to inform management and policy

Bibliographic Data

ID15544977
AuthorsClara C Pregitzer (0000-0003-3643-9405, Yale University, corresponding author), Mark S Ashton (0000-0002-1892-045X, Yale University), Sarah Charlop‐Powers (Central Park Conservancy), Sarah Charlop-Powers, Anthony W D’Amato (0000-0002-2570-4376, University of Vermont), Brent R Frey (Mississippi State University), Bram Gunther (New York City Police Department), Richard A Hallett (0000-0001-8462-8273, Northern Research Station), Kurt S Pregitzer (University of Idaho, corresponding author), Christopher W Woodall (0000-0001-8076-6214, Northern Research Station), Mark Bradford (0000-0002-2022-8331, Yale University), Mark A Bradford (0000-0003-4034-7562)
Year2019
Volume14
Issue8
Pages085002-085002
Publication date2019-05-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab2552
OpenAlexW2947858454
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited49

The context in which trees and forests grow in cities is highly variable and influences the provision of ecological, social, and economic benefits. Understanding the spatial extent, structure, and composition of forests is necessary to guide urban forest policy and management, yet current forest assessment methodologies vary widely in scale, sampling intensity, and focus. Current definitions of the urban forest include all trees growing in the urban environment, and have been translated to the design of urban forest assessments. However, such broad assessments may aggregate types of urban forest that differ significantly in usage and management needs. For example, street trees occur in highly developed environments, and are planted and cared for on an individual basis, whereas forested natural areas often occur in parkland, are managed at the stand level, and are primarily sustained by natural processes such as regeneration. We use multiple datasets for New York City to compare the outcomes from assessments of the entire urban forest, street trees, and forested natural areas. We find that non-stratified assessments of the entire urban forest are biased towards abundant canopy types in cities (e.g. street trees) and underestimate the condition of forested natural areas due to their uneven spatial arrangement. These natural areas account for one quarter of the city’s tree canopy, but represent the majority of trees both numerically and in terms of biomass. Non-stratified assessments of urban forest canopy should be modified to accurately represent the true composition of different urban forest types to inform effective policy and management

Canopy · Cartography · Context (archaeology · Environmental resource management · Forest management · Geography · Natural (archaeology · Scale (ratio · Tree canopy · Urban forest · Urban Forestry · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Urban Green Space and Health · Forestry

  • Fine-scale Eunis habitat mapping and forest spatial pattern analysis in a small Mediterranean city

    Open Access•Chiara D’Angeli, Dora Ceralli et al.•Journal of Maps•2026

  • Managing urban trees through storms in three United States cities

    Open Access•Stephanie Cadaval, Mysha Clarke et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2024

  • Monitoring spatial patterns of urban vegetation

    Open Access•John Duncan, John M A Duncan et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2023

  • Sustainable Urban Forest Conservation

    Open Access•Mirera Raphael Binyanya, Njuguna Bernard Mugwima et al.•Current Urban Studies•2022

  • Urban resilience and green infrastructure systems

    Open Access•Adriana Zuniga-Teran, Andrea K Gerlak et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2020

  • Spatial distribution of urban greenspace in response to urban development from a multi-scale perspective

    Open Access•Jing Wang, Weiqi Zhou et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Focus on sustainable cities

    Open Access•Matei Georgescu, Mazdak Arabi et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Curtis N Johnson, Andrew Balmford et al.•Science•2017

  • A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones

    Open Access•Sudipto Roy, Jason Byrne et al.•Urban Forestry & Urban Greening•2012

  • Tales of transforming cities

    Open Access•Katharina Hölscher, Niki Frantzeskaki et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2019

  • A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments

    Open Access•Jennifer Mullaney, Terry Lucke et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2015

  • Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA

    Open Access•David J Nowak, Daniel E Crane•Environmental Pollution•2002

  • Is All Urban Green Space the Same? A Comparison of the Health Benefits of Trees and Grass in New York City

    Open Access•Colleen E Reid, Jane E Clougherty et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • Prospective Cohort Study to Elucidate the Correlation between Occupational Stress and Hypertension Risk in Oil Workers from Kelamayi City in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China

    Open Access•Rong Li, Xiaoyan Gao et al.•International Journal of…•2016

  • Advancing urban ecosystem governance in New York City

    Open Access•Helen M Forgione, Clara C Pregitzer et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2016

  • Applicability of Citygreen Urban Ecosystem Analysis Software to a Densely Built Urban Neighborhood

    Travis Longcore, Christina Li et al.•Urban Geography•2004

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,17
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae