Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A hybrid model approach for estimating health burden from NO 2 in megacities in China

A case study in Guangzhou

Bibliographic Data

ID15545446
AuthorsBaihuiqian He (0000-0003-1994-4151, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, corresponding author), Mathew R Heal (0000-0001-5539-7293, University of Edinburgh), Kamilla H Humstad (0000-0003-1017-2191, University of Edinburgh), Liu Yan (0000-0001-5155-7448, Tsinghua University), Qiang Zhang (0000-0003-4613-3100, Tsinghua University), Stefan Reis (0000-0003-2428-8320, University of Exeter)
Year2019
Volume14
Issue12
Pages124019-124019
Publication date2019-10-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab4f96
OpenAlexW2981802646
LanguageEN
References cited61

Background: Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) poses substantial public health risks in large cities globally. Concentrations of NO 2 shows high spatial variation, yet intra-urban measurements of NO 2 in Chinese cities are sparse. The size of Chinese cities and shortage of some datasets is challenging for high spatial resolution modelling. The aim here was to combine advantages of dispersion and land-use regression (LUR) modelling to simulate population exposure to NO 2 at high spatial resolution for health burden calculations, in the example megacity of Guangzhou. Methods: Ambient concentrations of NO 2 simulated by the ADMS-Urban dispersion model at 83 ‘virtual’ monitoring sites, selected to span both the range of NO 2 concentration and weighting by population density, were used to develop a LUR model of 2017 annual-mean NO 2 across Guangzhou at 25 m × 25 m spatial resolution. Results: The LUR model was validated against both the 83 virtual sites (adj R 2 : 0.96, RMSE: 5.48 μ g m −3 ; LOOCV R 2 : 0.96, RMSE: 5.64 μ g m −3 ) and, independently, against available observations ( n = 11, R 2: : 0.63, RMSE: 18.0 μ g m −3 ). The modelled population-weighted long-term average concentration of NO 2 across Guangzhou was 52.5 μ g m −3 , which contributes an estimated 7270 (6960−7620) attributable deaths. Reducing concentrations in exceedance of the China air quality standard/WHO air quality guideline of 40 μ g m −3 would reduce NO 2 -attributable deaths by 1900 (1820–1980). Conclusions: We demonstrate a general hybrid modelling method that can be employed in other cities in China to model ambient NO 2 concentration at high spatial resolution for health burden estimation and epidemiological study. By running the dispersion model with alternative mitigation policies, new LUR models can be constructed to quantify policy effectiveness on NO 2 population health burden

Air pollution · Air quality index · China · Environmental health · Geography · Mean squared error · Megacity · Meteorology · Population · Statistics · Weighting · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Climate Change and Health Impacts · Environmental Science · Mathematics · Medicine · Urban Transport and Accessibility

  • Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions

    Open Access•Bo Zheng, Dan Tong et al.•Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics•2018

  • Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution

    Open Access•Aaron J Cohen, Michael Brauer et al.•The Lancet•2017

  • Development of NO2 and NOx land use regression models for estimating air pollution exposure in 36 study areas in Europe – The Escape project

    Rob Beelen, Gerard Hoek et al.•Atmospheric Environment (1967)•2013

  • Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China)

    Open Access•C Y Jim, Wendy Y Chen•Journal of Environmental Management•2008

  • A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models

    Open Access•Michael Jerrett, M ALTAF ARAIN et al.•Journal of Exposure Science &…•2005

  • Air pollution in mega cities in China

    Open Access•Chak K Chan, Xiaohong Yao•Atmospheric Environment (1967)•2008

  • Air pollution and health

    Open Access•B Brunekreef, Stephen T Holgate•The Lancet•2002

  • Health impact of China's Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan

    Open Access•Jing Huang, Xiaochuan Pan et al.•The Lancet Planetary Health•2018

  • ‘Effortless Perfection

    Open Access•Dalia Ghanem, Junjie Zhang•Journal of Environmental…•2014

  • National- to port-level inventories of shipping emissions in China

    Open Access•Mingliang Fu, Huan Liu et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • The Interaction between Ambient PM10 and NO2 on Mortality in Guangzhou, China

    Open Access•Yuzhou Gu, Hualiang Lin et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • Health risk assessment of China’s main air pollutants

    Open Access•Jian Sun, Tiancai Zhou•BMC Public Health•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae