Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do responses to different anthropogenic forcings add linearly in climate models

Bibliographic Data

ID15545589
AuthorsKate Marvel (0000-0002-9771-6720, Goddard Institute for Space Studies, corresponding author), Gavin A Schmidt (0000-0002-2258-0486, Goddard Institute for Space Studies), Drew Shindell (0000-0003-1552-4715, Duke University), C Bonfils (0000-0002-4674-5708, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), Allegra N LeGrande (0000-0002-5295-0062, Goddard Institute for Space Studies), Larissa Nazarenko (0000-0003-3172-9358, Goddard Institute for Space Studies), Kostas Tsigaridis (0000-0001-5328-819X, Columbia University)
Year2015
Volume10
Issue10
Pages104010-104010
Publication date2015-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/10/10/104010
OpenAlexW2288631696
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited30

Many detection and attribution and pattern scaling studies assume that the global climate response to multiple forcings is additive: that the response over the historical period is statistically indistinguishable from the sum of the responses to individual forcings. Here, we use the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) and National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate System Model (CCSM4) simulations from the CMIP5 archive to test this assumption for multi-year trends in global-average, annual-average temperature and precipitation at multiple timescales. We find that responses in models forced by pre-computed aerosol and ozone concentrations are generally additive across forcings. However, we demonstrate that there are significant nonlinearities in precipitation responses to different forcings in a configuration of the GISS model that interactively computes these concentrations from precursor emissions. We attribute these to differences in ozone forcing arising from interactions between forcing agents. Our results suggest that attribution to specific forcings may be complicated in a model with fully interactive chemistry and may provide motivation for other modeling groups to conduct further single-forcing experiments

Aerosol · Atmospheric sciences · Attribution · Climate change · Climate model · Climatology · Forcing (mathematics · Geography · Meteorology · Precipitation · Radiative forcing · Scaling · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols · Climate variability and models · Environmental Science · Mathematics · Geology

  • Uncertainty in optimal fingerprinting is underestimated

    Open Access•Yan Li, Kun Chen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Human influence strengthens the contrast between tropical wet and dry regions

    Open Access•Andrew Schurer, Andrew Ballinger et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle

    Open Access•Myles R Allen, William Ingram et al.•Nature•2002

  • Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming

    Isaac M Held, Brian J Soden•Journal of Climate•2006

  • The physical drivers of historical and 21st century global precipitation changes

    Open Access•Livia Thorpe, Timothy Andrews•Environmental Research Letters•2014

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2021 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae