Achieving ambitious climate targets
Is it economical for New Zealand to invest in agricultural GHG mitigation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15545679 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J CARROLL (0000-0001-7683-6961, University of Maine, corresponding author), Adam Daigneault (0000-0002-8287-8727, University of Maine) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 124064-124064 |
| Publication date | 2019-11-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Research Letters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326 |
| Publisher | IOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab542a |
| OpenAlex | W2987414953 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 39 |
Reducing agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which contribute approximately 24% of global emissions, is important to efficiently achieve the goals of the Paris Agreement; however, most mitigation options have focused on industrialized, not pastoral farming practices. New Zealand (NZ) has ambitious GHG reduction targets, but biogenic emissions from the agricultural sector are nearly half of total annual emissions and hence must be an integral part of the solution. We use a national-level economic land use model to estimate the benefits and costs of implementing land-based GHG emissions reduction practices that are currently available and/or under development. Results indicate the cost and effectiveness of modeled practices are highly variable, with individual practices capable of reducing gross GHGs by 2% to 62%. Methane inhibitors are estimated to be highly effective but costly, while targeted urine patch treatments are cheap but less effective. Afforestation and methane vaccines cost less than $50/tCO 2 e and could reduce NZ’s GHG emissions by at least 20%. Using a mix of current and emerging mitigation practices to achieve reduction targets ranging from 10% to 50% could cost an average of $14 to $76/tCO 2 e, potentially much less than estimates for achieving similar targets from NZ’s energy and transportation sectors. Sensitivity analysis indicates that commercialization of an effective methane vaccine at a cost that is typical of other livestock vaccines is critical to achieving a 50% gross emissions reduction target. Without it, a large portion of land could be left fallow. The practices and technologies evaluated in this paper are not unique to New Zealand and could be adopted globally, thereby helping other nations achieve their climate mitigation goals more cost-effectively
Agricultural economics · Agriculture · Business · Commercialization · Economics · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Environmental Science · Rural development and sustainability · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change
Advancing agricultural greenhouse gas quantification
Climate adaptation as mitigation
Impact of greenhouse gas metrics on the quantification of agricultural emissions and farm-scale mitigation strategies
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security
Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions
Equitably slicing the pie
An evaluation of the effect of greenhouse gas accounting methods on a marginal abatement cost curve for Irish agricultural greenhouse gas emissions
Identifying cost-competitive greenhouse gas mitigation potential of French agriculture
How costly is mitigation of non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture
Absolving the sins of emission
| Citations per year | 0.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2020 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |