The costs and benefits of fire management for carbon mitigation in Alaska through 2100
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15545875 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Molly Elder (0000-0002-5872-7582, Tufts University, corresponding author), Carly Phillips (0000-0003-1232-2683, Woodwell Climate Research Center), Carly A Phillips, Stefano Potter (0000-0002-5141-3409, Woodwell Climate Research Center), Peter C Frumhoff (0000-0002-5037-919X, Union of Concerned Scientists), Brendan M Rogers (0000-0001-6711-8466, Woodwell Climate Research Center) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | 105001-105001 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Research Letters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326 |
| Publisher | IOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ac8e85 |
| OpenAlex | W4294215120 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 73 |
Climate change is intensifying fire regimes across boreal regions, and thus both burned area and carbon emissions from combustion are expected to increase significantly over the next several decades. Fire management through initial suppression of fires is effective at reducing burned area, but limited work has addressed the role that fire management can play in reducing wildfire carbon emissions and their impacts on climate change. In this work, we draw on historical data covering fire and fire management in Alaska to project burned area and management outcomes to 2100. We allow management to both respond to and impact variations in annual burned area and carbon emissions, while keeping decadal-average burned area at or above historical levels. The total cost of a fire is calculated as the combination of management expenditures and the social cost of carbon (SCC) emissions during combustion, using the SCC framework. Incorporating the tradeoff between management expenditures and burned area, we project that by 2100, increasing management effort by 5–10 times relative to current expenditures would minimize combined management and emissions costs. This is driven by the finding that the social costs of carbon emissions greatly exceed management costs unless burned area is constrained to near the average historical level. Our analysis does not include the many health, economic, and non-CO 2 climate impacts from fires, so we likely underestimate the benefits of increased fire suppression and thus the optimal management level. As fire regimes continue to intensify, our work suggests increased management expenditures will be necessary to counteract increasing carbon combustion and lower overall climate impact
Boreal · Climate change · Environmental resource management · Fire protection · Geography · Greenhouse gas · Work (physics · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Engineering · Environmental Science · Fire effects on ecosystems · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Ecology
Vegetation mediated the impacts of postglacial climate change on fire regimes in the south‐central Brooks Range, Alaska
Fat-Tailed Uncertainty in the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change
The Use and Misuse of Models for Climate Policy
Wildland fire smoke and human health
Discounting climate change
A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke
Critical Review of Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke Exposure
Valuing the impacts of forest disturbances on ecosystem services
The effects of fire on the thermal stability of permafrost in lowland and upland black spruce forests of interior Alaska in a changing climate
Increasing fire and logging disturbances in Siberian boreal forests
Modeling the effects of fire severity and climate warming on active layer thickness and soil carbon storage of black spruce forests across the landscape in interior Alaska
Siberian taiga and tundra fire regimes from 2001–2020
Bottom-up drivers of future fire regimes in western boreal North America
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |