Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Challenges to aboveground biomass prediction from waveform lidar

Bibliographic Data

ID15545972
AuthorsJamis M Bruening (0000-0002-9750-7806, University of Maryland, College Park, corresponding author), Rico Fischer (0000-0002-7142-1756, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), Friedrich J Bohn (0000-0002-7328-1187, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), John Armston (0000-0003-1232-3424, University of Maryland, College Park), Amanda Armstrong (0000-0003-0314-7406), A H Armstrong (0000-0002-9123-8924, Goddard Space Flight Center), Nikolai Knapp (0000-0001-5065-9979, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), Hao Tang (0009-0008-7427-6321, National University of Singapore), Andreas Huth (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research), Ralph Dubayah (0000-0003-1440-6346, University of Maryland, College Park)
Year2021
Volume16
Issue12
Pages125013-125013
Publication date2021-11-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ac3cec
OpenAlexW3214978486
LanguageEN
References cited31

Accurate accounting of aboveground biomass density (AGBD) is crucial for carbon cycle, biodiversity, and climate change science. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI), which maps global AGBD from waveform lidar, is the first of a new generation of Earth observation missions designed to improve carbon accounting. This paper explores the possibility that lidar waveforms may not be unique to AGBD—that forest stands with different AGBD may produce highly similar waveforms—and we hypothesize that non-uniqueness may contribute to the large uncertainties in AGBD predictions. Our analysis integrates simulated GEDI waveforms from 428 in situ stem maps with output from an individual-based forest gap model, which we use to generate a database of potential forest stands and simulate GEDI waveforms from those stands. We use this database to predict the AGBD of the 428 in situ stem maps via two different methods: a linear regression from waveform metrics, and a waveform-matching approach that accounts for waveform-AGBD non-uniqueness. We find that some in situ waveforms are more unique to AGBD than others, which notably impacts AGBD prediction uncertainty (7–411 Mg ha −1 , average of 167 Mg ha −1 ). We also find that forest structure complexity may influence the non-uniqueness effect; stands with low structural complexity are more unique to AGBD than more mature stands with multiple cohorts and canopy layers. These findings suggest that the non-uniqueness phenomena may be introduced by the measuring characteristics of waveform lidar in combination with how forest structure manifests at small scales, and we discuss how this complexity may complicate uncertainty estimation in AGBD prediction. This analysis suggests a limit to the accuracy and precision of AGBD predictions from lidar waveforms seen in empirical studies, and underscores the need for further exploration of the relationships between lidar remote sensing measurements, forest structure, and AGBD

Biology · Biomass (ecology · Canopy · Ecosystem · Forest ecology · Geography · Lidar · Matching (statistics · Remote sensing · Statistics · Waveform · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Forest ecology and management · Mathematics · Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Ecology

  • Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer

    Open Access•Maksim Kunitski, Nicolas Eicke et al.•Nature Communications•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae