Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Effect on the Earth system of realizing a 1.5 °C warming climate target after overshooting to the 2 °C level

Datos Bibliográficos

ID15547136
AutoresKaoru Tachiiri (0009-0006-1726-5584, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, autor de correspondencia), Diego Silva Herran (0000-0001-5484-4442, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies), Xuanming Su (0000-0001-5595-3392, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology), Michio Kawamiya (0000-0001-7553-0522, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology)
Año2019
Volumen14
Número12
Páginas124063-124063
Fecha de publicación2019-10-28
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
EditorialIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab5199
OpenAlexW2982553529
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas44

An Earth system model (ESM) was used to investigate the effect of reaching the target of 1.5 °C warming (relative to preindustrial levels) after overshooting to the 2 °C level with respect to selected global environment indicators. Two scenarios were compared that diverged after reaching the 2 °C level: one stayed at the 2 °C level, and the other cooled to the 1.5 °C level. Unlike the internationally coordinated model intercomparison projects, the scenarios were developed for a specific climatic model with emissions and land use scenarios consistent with socioeconomic projections from an integrated assessment model. The ESM output resulted in delayed realization of the 1.5 °C and 2 °C targets expected for 2100. The cumulative CO 2 emissions for 2010−2100 (2300) were 358 (−53) GtCO 2 in the 2 °C scenario and −337 (−936) GtCO 2 in the 1.5 °C scenario. We examined the effect of overshooting on commonly used indicators related to surface air temperature, sea surface temperature and total ocean heat uptake. Global vegetation productivity at 2100 showed around a 5% increase in the 2 °C scenario without overshooting compared with the 1.5 °C scenario with overshooting, considered to be caused by more precipitation and stronger CO 2 fertilization. A considerable difference was found between the two scenarios in terms of Arctic sea ice, whereas both scenarios indicated few corals would survive past the 21st century. The difference in steric sea level rise, reflecting total cumulative ocean heat uptake, between the two scenarios was <2 cm in 2100, and around 9 cm in 2300 in the Pacific Island region. A large overshoot may reduce the eventual difference between targets (i.e. 1.5 °C in contrast to 2 °C), particularly in terms of the indicators related to total ocean heat uptake, and to sensitive biological thresholds

Arctic · Atmospheric sciences · Climate change · Climate model · Climatology · Coupled model intercomparison project · Earth system science · Geography · Global warming · Meteorology · Physical geography · Precipitation · Representative Concentration Pathways · Sea ice · Sea level · Sea surface temperature · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Climate variability and models · Environmental Science · Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses · Geology · Oceanography

  • Identifying crucial emission sources under low forcing scenarios by a comprehensive attribution analysis

    Open Access•Xuanming Su, Kaoru Tachiiri et al.•One Earth•2022

  • Contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO 2 emissions scenarios

    Open Access•Jean‐pierre Gattuso, J-P Gattuso et al.•Science•2015

  • Rcp2.6

    Open Access•Detlef P Van Vuuren, Elke Stehfest et al.•Climatic Change•2011

  • Differential climate impacts for policy-relevant limits to global warming

    Open Access•Carl‐Friedrich Schleussner, Tabea Lissner et al.•Earth System Dynamics•2016

  • Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C

    Open Access•Richard Millar, Richard J Millar et al.•Nature Geoscience•2017

  • Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, Magicc6 – Part 1

    Open Access•Malte Meinshausen, S C B Raper et al.•Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics•2011

  • Rcp4.5

    Open Access•Allison M Thomson, Katherine Calvin et al.•Climatic Change•2011

  • The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6

    Open Access•Brian C O''Neill, Claudia Tebaldi et al.•Geoscientific Model Development•2016

  • Meeting global temperature targets—the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage

    Open Access•Christian Azar, Daniel Johansson et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2013

  • The effectiveness of net negative carbon dioxide emissions in reversing anthropogenic climate change

    Open Access•Katarzyna Tokarska, Kirsten Zickfeld•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • How do climate-related uncertainties influence 2 and 1.5 °C pathways

    Open Access•Xuanming Su, Hideo Shiogama et al.•Sustainability Science•2018

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,25
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2022 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae