Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dispersion bias, dispersion effect, and the aerosol–cloud conundrum

Bibliographic Data

ID15547174
AuthorsYangang Liu (0000-0002-4667-4583, Brookhaven National Laboratory, corresponding author), Peter H Daum (Brookhaven National Laboratory), Huan Guo (0000-0002-7984-8674, Brookhaven National Laboratory), Yiran Peng (0000-0002-3686-5458, University of Victoria)
Year2008
Volume3
Issue4
Pages045021-045021
Publication date2008-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045021
OpenAlexW2147372260
LanguageEN
References cited50

This work examines the influences of relative dispersion (the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean radius of the cloud droplet size distribution) on cloud albedo and cloud radiative forcing, derives an analytical formulation that accounts explicitly for the contribution from droplet concentration and relative dispersion, and presents a new approach to parameterize relative dispersion in climate models. It is shown that inadequate representation of relative dispersion in climate models leads to an overestimation of cloud albedo, resulting in a negative bias of global mean shortwave cloud radiative forcing that can be comparable to the warming caused by doubling CO2 in magnitude, and that this dispersion bias is likely near its maximum for ambient clouds. Relative dispersion is empirically expressed as a function of the quotient between cloud liquid water content and droplet concentration (i.e., water per droplet), yielding an analytical formulation for the first aerosol indirect effect. Further analysis of the new expression reveals that the dispersion effect not only offsets the cooling from the Twomey effect, but is also proportional to the Twomey effect in magnitude. These results suggest that unrealistic representation of relative dispersion in cloud parameterization in general, and evaluation of aerosol indirect effects in particular, is at least in part responsible for several outstanding puzzles of the aerosol–cloud conundrum: for example, overestimation of cloud radiative cooling by climate models compared to satellite observations; large uncertainty and discrepancy in estimates of the aerosol indirect effect; and the lack of interhemispheric difference in cloud albedo

Aerosol · Albedo (alchemy · Astrophysics · Atmospheric sciences · Climate change · Climate model · Cloud albedo · Cloud computing · Cloud cover · Cloud forcing · Dispersion (optics · Effective radius · Forcing (mathematics · Liquid water content · Meteorology · Optics · Physics · Radiative forcing · Radiative transfer · Shortwave · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Atmospheric aerosols and clouds · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols · Environmental Science · Geology

  • Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle

    Open Access•V Ramanathan, Paul J Crutzen et al.•Science•2001

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae