Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Revealing the seasonal cycles of Arctic phytoplankton

Insights from year-round chlorophyll monitoring

Bibliographic Data

ID15547287
AuthorsEunho Ko (0009-0000-7037-3353, Korea Polar Research Institute), Jisoo Park (0000-0002-3865-083X, Korea Polar Research Institute, corresponding author), Kyoung‐Ho Cho (0000-0001-5527-5851, Korea Polar Research Institute), Jaeill Yoo (Korea Polar Research Institute), Jong Kuk Moon (Korea Polar Research Institute), Chorom Shim (0009-0004-0762-6214, Korea Polar Research Institute), Eun Jin Yang (0000-0002-8639-5968, Korea Polar Research Institute)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue2
Pages024028-024028
Publication date2024-01-15
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ad1e7e
OpenAlexW4390871340
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited42

Rapid Arctic Ocean warming has caused severe sea ice decline, impacting light distribution, phytoplankton blooms, and primary production. We investigated Arctic phytoplankton bloom timing using continuous chlorophyll-a fluorescence data obtained from three Korea Arctic Mooring Systems (KAMSs) deployed north of the East Siberian Sea (KAMS1), north of the Chukchi Sea (KAMS2), and the middle of the Northwind Ridge (KAMS4). Our findings revealed that the bloom initiation times were June 4 (±28 d) in KAMS1, June 24 in KAMS2, and May 21 (±6 d) in KAMS4, when the sea ice concentration (SIC) was >90% and the ice thickness was 1–2 m, indicating that the under-ice phytoplankton blooms (UIBs) developed 1–2 months before the sea ice retreated (mid-July, when SIC was <80%). Peak bloom and termination times were consistently observed in early August and mid-October, respectively. The average phytoplankton bloom lasted for approximately four months, longer than the open water periods at the mooring sites. However, the timing of the phytoplankton blooms from the biogeochemical model-based reconstructions was, on average, 6–10 weeks later than that deduced from the observed data. Furthermore, the maximum chlorophyll-a concentration observed during the bloom peak was approximately ten-times higher than that indicated by the biogeochemical model-based reconstructions (1.81 vs. 0.17 mg −3 ). The differences in chlorophyll-a concentrations and bloom timings indicate that biogeochemical models remain insufficient for simulating the phytoplankton dynamics of the Arctic Ocean, such as UIBs and the subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer. Based on the continuously observed chlorophyll-a concentrations, we gained a precise understanding of the seasonal cycles of Arctic phytoplankton, including UIBs. These valuable data will contribute to improving the accuracy of biogeochemical models of the Arctic Ocean

Algal bloom · Arctic · Biogeochemical cycle · Biology · Bloom · Chlorophyll a · Nutrient · Phytoplankton · Polar night · Sea ice · Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics · Environmental Science · Marine and coastal ecosystems · Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena · Ecology · Geology · Oceanography

  • Insights into the year-round vertical distribution of chlorophyll concentration in high-latitude Arctic Ocean

    Open Access•Jisoo Park, Eunho Ko et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Arctic sea ice thickness, volume, and multiyear ice coverage

    Open Access•R Kwok•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Changing state of Arctic sea ice across all seasons

    Open Access•Julienne Strœve, Dirk Notz•Environmental Research Letters•2018

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae