China’s embodied environmental impact on the Global Commons through provincial and spillover perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15547484 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Han Zhao (0000-0002-8579-1600, The University of Tokyo, corresponding author), Tyrus Miller (Yale University), T Reed Miller (0000-0002-6516-5717), Zachary A Wendling (0000-0002-4480-0582), Naoko Ishii (The University of Tokyo), Akiyuki Kawasaki (0000-0002-1769-7604, The University of Tokyo) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 034003-034003 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Research Letters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326 |
| Publisher | IOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/acb729 |
| OpenAlex | W4318540921 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 46 |
Existing benchmarks for assessing China’s environmental progress ignore the important issue of transboundary impacts and also lack systematic methods that focus on China’s subnational level. By using techniques based on a multiregion input–output model, we develop a new framework, China’s Subnational-level Global Commons Stewardship (CS-GCS) index system. This framework summarizes multiple Global Commons domains into a comprehensive assessment, to synergistically track the embodied environmental impacts and score trajectories across China from both provincial and spillover perspectives. We find that, although China’s developing provinces perform better, developed provinces made more significant improvements from 2007 to 2015. There is no significant trend of increase in China’s outsourcing of environmental impacts to other countries over this period. However, there is still a disproportionate environmental responsibility for the Global Commons between regions, particularly the outsourcing of impacts from the eastern coast to the northern hinterland. Of these, the impact embodied in interprovincial trade is two to seven times greater than international trade, which will further dominate China’s environmental impacts. Agriculture is the crucial sectoral driver in all environmental domains. Our study serves as a method of helping assess and coordinate subnational efforts in China and prioritize environmental action
Agriculture · Business · China · Commons · Economics · Environmental impact assessment · Environmental resource management · Environmental stewardship · Geography · Outsourcing · Political science · Spillover effect · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Sustainable Development Report 2022
Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the Sustainable Development Goals
Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions
Assessment of city sustainability—Coupling coordinated development among economy, society and environment
Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time
Building Eora
Regional development and carbon emissions in China
Consolidation of agricultural land can contribute to agricultural sustainability in China
The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis
Reset Sustainable Development Goals for a pandemic world
Frameworks for Comparing Emissions Associated with Production, Consumption, And International Trade
Planetary boundaries
A safe operating space for humanity
Footprint of SO2 in China's international trade and the interregional hotspot analysis
Re-examine environmental Kuznets curve in China
Sustainable Development Report 2021
Trade and Embodied CO2 Emissions
Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by Earth system interactions
Inclusive wealth index measuring sustainable development potentials for Chinese cities
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |