Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The influence of non-CO 2 forcings on cumulative carbon emissions budgets

Bibliographic Data

ID15547737
AuthorsKatarzyna Tokarska (0000-0001-8887-8798, University of Victoria, corresponding author), Nathan P Gillett (0000-0002-2957-0002, Environment and Climate Change Canada), Vivek K Arora (0000-0002-2620-9342, Environment and Climate Change Canada), Warren G Lee (0000-0001-7121-2148, Environment and Climate Change Canada), Kirsten Zickfeld (0000-0001-8866-6541, Simon Fraser University)
Year2018
Volume13
Issue3
Pages034039-034039
Publication date2018-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/aaafdd
OpenAlexW2790297778
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited23

Carbon budgets provide a useful tool for policymakers to help meet the global climate targets, as they specify total allowable carbon emissions consistent with limiting warming to a given temperature threshold. Non-CO2 forcings have a net warming effect in the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) scenarios, leading to reductions in remaining carbon budgets based on CO2 forcing alone. Carbon budgets consistent with limiting warming to below 2.0 °C, with and without accounting for the effects of non-CO2 forcings, were assessed in inconsistent ways by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), making the effects of non-CO2 forcings hard to identify. Here we use a consistent approach to compare 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C carbon budgets with and without accounting for the effects of non-CO2 forcings, using CO2-only and RCP8.5 simulations. The median allowable carbon budgets for 1.5 °C and 2.0 °C warming are reduced by 257 PgC and 418 PgC, respectively, and the uncertainty ranges on the budgets are reduced by more than a factor of two when accounting for the net warming effects of non-CO2 forcings. While our overall results are consistent with IPCC, we use a more robust methodology, and explain the narrower uncertainty ranges of carbon budgets when non-CO2 forcings are included. We demonstrate that most of the reduction in carbon budgets is a result of the direct warming effect of the non-CO2 forcings, with a secondary contribution from the influence of the non-CO2 forcings on the carbon cycle. Such carbon budgets are expected to play an increasingly important role in climate change mitigation, thus understanding the influence of non-CO2 forcings on these budgets and their uncertainties is critical

Atmospheric sciences · Carbon cycle · Carbon fibers · Climate change · Climatology · Ecosystem · Forcing (mathematics · Global warming · Greenhouse gas · Limiting · Radiative forcing · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Climate variability and models · Environmental Science · Mathematics

  • Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets

    Open Access•Joeri Rogelj, Piers Forster et al.•Nature•2019

  • Quantifying the probability distribution function of the transient climate response to cumulative CO 2 emissions

    Open Access•Lynsay Spafford, Andrew H MacDougall•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets

    Open Access•Robin Lamboll, Zebedee Nicholls et al.•Nature Climate Change•2023

  • Damage function uncertainty increases the social cost of methane and nitrous oxide

    Open Access•Tianpeng Wang, Fei Teng•Nature Climate Change•2023

  • Modeling the non-CO2 contribution to climate change

    Open Access•Christopher J Smith, Chris Smith et al.•One Earth•2022

  • Uncertainty in carbon budget estimates due to internal climate variability

    Open Access•Katarzyna Tokarska, Vivek K Arora et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Climate and carbon budget implications of linked future changes in CO 2 and non-CO 2 forcing

    Open Access•Felipe Feijoo, Bryan K Mignone et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Dynamic modelling shows substantial contribution of ecosystem restoration to climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Emma Littleton, Kate Dooley et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300

    Open Access•Malte Meinshausen, Steven J Smith et al.•Climatic Change•2011

  • Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C

    Open Access•Richard Millar, Richard J Millar et al.•Nature Geoscience•2017

  • The representative concentration pathways

    Open Access•Detlef P Van Vuuren, Jae Edmonds et al.•Climatic Change•2011

  • The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions

    Open Access•H Damon Matthews, Nathan P Gillett et al.•Nature•2009

  • Accounting for carbon cycle feedbacks in a comparison of the global warming effects of greenhouse gases

    Open Access•Nathan P Gillett, H Damon Matthews•Environmental Research Letters•2010

  • Sensitivity of carbon budgets to permafrost carbon feedbacks and non-CO 2 forcings

    Open Access•Andrew H MacDougall, Kirsten Zickfeld et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2015

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,14
Citation span2019 - 2023 (5)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae