Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Carbon dioxide removal and net zero emissions in Africa

An integrated assessment modelling based on three different land-based negative emission solutions

Bibliographic Data

ID15547797
AuthorsJeffrey Dankwa Ampah (0000-0002-0985-151X, Tianjin University, corresponding author), Sandylove Afrane (Tianjin University), Humphrey Adun (0000-0002-8593-814X, Near East University, corresponding author), Michael O Dioha (0000-0001-6983-6752, Clean Air Task Force, corresponding author), Ephraim Bonah Agyekum (0000-0002-6947-4349, Ural Federal University), Abdulfatah Abdu Yusuf (0000-0002-8054-9022, University of Liberia), Mudassar Naseer (Tianjin University), Olusola Bamisile (0000-0002-5154-6404, Imperial College London)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue8
Pages084021-084021
Publication date2024-07-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dcf
OpenAlexW4400225289
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited43

As the remaining carbon budget for limiting warming to 1.5 °C rapidly diminishes, it is clear that, besides decarbonization, the world will need to remove 100–1000 GtCO 2 from the atmosphere by the end of the century. Yet, Africa, where many carbon removal schemes are planned, remains a ‘blindspot’ in existing studies. There is limited understanding of the trade-offs and synergies associated with carbon removal within Africa’s energy-land-water system. To address this research gap, we model a stylized net-zero emissions (NZEs) in Africa by 2050, with focus on three land-based biological carbon removal approaches: afforestation/reforestation (AR), bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), and biochar. We find that by 2050, the total gross carbon removal is projected to reach 1.2 GtCO 2 yr −1 when all three carbon removal approaches are available, and 0.5 GtCO 2 yr −1 when Africa relies solely on AR. Pursuing NZE with only AR or AR alongside biochar in Africa would be the most expensive mitigation option but they lead to the lowest residual fossil fuel and industry CO 2 emissions. An NZE by 2050 in Africa could reduce cropland by 30%–40% from 2020 to 2050, depending on the carbon dioxide removal deployment strategy adopted. Southern Africa would be particularly affected, facing significant challenges in balancing food security with climate goals. The highest increase in staple food prices will occur under AR only, while the availability of AR-BECCS-biochar produces the lowest rise in staple food prices. Our findings highlight the need for balanced and region-specific carbon dioxide removal strategies to ensure climate and other sustainability goals are met

Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage · Biochar · Carbon credit · Carbon dioxide · Carbon dioxide removal · Carbon sequestration · Economics · Environmental protection · Fossil fuel · Greenhouse gas · Marginal abatement cost · Natural resource economics · Waste management · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy and Environment Impacts · Environmental Science · Ecology

  • Advancing nature-based solutions toward sustainability

    Open Access•Xu Yue, Ge Sun et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways

    Open Access•Giulia Realmonte, Laurent Drouet et al.•Nature Communications•2019

  • Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China

    Open Access•Zhu Liu, Zhu Deng et al.•Nature Reviews Earth & Environment•2021

  • A multi-model analysis of long-term emissions and warming implications of current mitigation efforts

    Open Access•Ida Sognnæs, Ajay Gambhir et al.•Nature Climate Change•2021

  • Assessing the size and uncertainty of remaining carbon budgets

    Open Access•Robin Lamboll, Zebedee Nicholls et al.•Nature Climate Change•2023

  • Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation

    Open Access•Shaikh Eskander, Samuel Fankhauser•Nature Climate Change•2020

  • Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy–water–land system

    Open Access•Jay Fuhrman, Candelaria Bergero et al.•Nature Climate Change•2023

  • Ratcheting of climate pledges needed to limit peak global warming

    Open Access•Gokul Iyer, Yang Ou et al.•Nature Climate Change•2022

  • Food–energy–water implications of negative emissions technologies in a +1.5 °C future

    Open Access•Jay Fuhrman, Haewon McJeon et al.•Nature Climate Change•2020

  • Meeting well-below 2°C target would increase energy sector jobs globally

    Open Access•Sandeep Pai, Johannes Emmerling et al.•One Earth•2021

  • Biochar as a carbon dioxide removal strategy in integrated long-run mitigation scenarios

    Open Access•Candelaria Bergero, Marshall Wise et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • The water consumption of energy production

    Open Access•Edward S Spang, William R Moomaw et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2014

  • Preconditions for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) in sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Anna Hansson, Anders Hansson et al.•Environment Development and…•2020

  • Biochar—One way forward for soil carbon in offset mechanisms in Africa

    Open Access•Thea Whitman, Johannes Lehmann•Environmental Science & Policy•2009

  • The SSP4

    Open Access•Katherine Calvin, Ben Bond‐Lamberty et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Ssp3

    Open Access•Shinichiro Fujimori, Tomoko Hasegawa et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2

    Open Access•Oliver Fricko, Peter Havlík et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications

    Open Access•Keywan Riahi, Detlef P Van Vuuren et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways

    Open Access•Alexander Popp, Katherine Calvin et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • The roads ahead

    Open Access•Brian C O''Neill, Elmar Kriegler et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Varieties of market-based policy

    Jonas Meckling, Steffen Jenner•Environmental Politics•2016

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae