Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Explaining hot spots of methane flux in a restored wetland

The role of water level, soil disturbance, and methanotrophy

Bibliographic Data

ID15547857
AuthorsCamilo Rey‐Sánchez (0000-0003-4762-9001, North Carolina State University, corresponding author), Ariane Arias‐Ortiz (0000-0001-9408-0061, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona), Kuno Kasak (0000-0002-0810-2154, University of Tartu), Robert Shortt (0000-0001-5690-4656, University of California, Berkeley), Daphne Szutu (0000-0001-7698-0461, University of California, Berkeley), Joseph Verfaillie (0000-0002-7009-8942, University of California, Berkeley), Thomas D Lorenson (0000-0001-7669-2873, Pacific Science Center), Thomas Lorenson, Martin Liira (0000-0001-7857-9233, University of Tartu), Peeter Somelar (0000-0003-3188-0402, University of Tartu), Mikk Espenberg (0000-0003-0469-6394, University of Tartu), Dennis Baldocchi (0000-0003-3496-4919, University of California, Berkeley)
Year2025
Volume20
Issue7
Pages074064-074064
Publication date2025-06-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ade45b
OpenAlexW4411264506
LanguageEN
References cited47

A high degree of uncertainty persists regarding current and future emissions of methane from both natural and constructed wetlands. Part of the problem is the existence of ‘hot spots’ of methane flux, which have not been clearly identified and studied at multiple scales. Methane has a short lifetime compared to carbon dioxide; thus, efforts to avoid methane hot spots from constructed wetlands can promptly decelerate the rate of atmospheric warming. In this study we measured methane fluxes using flux towers in a restored oligohaline wetland in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, where we previously identified a hot spot of methane flux using footprint-weighed flux maps and chambers. Our main objectives with this study were to determine why this hot spot occurs and what are the biogeochemical and microbiological conditions that lead to these high methane fluxes. We found four main mechanisms that explain the existence of the hot spot. (1) The hot spot was associated with areas where the water level was closer to the surface (2) Methane originated mostly from older unoxidized peat in deeper layers, which had a shorter migration pathway to the atmosphere at the hot spot location due to soil disturbance during wetland construction. (3) Relatively lower methane oxidation in the hot spot in the upper soil layer (10–30 cm under the surface), deduced from isotopic profiles in porewater carbon and upper-level methanotroph abundance. (4) Higher ebullition events at the hot spot that can be related to low water levels and lower bulk density throughout the soil profile. This study thus suggests that mitigating soil disturbances during wetland construction and managing water level can reduce the occurrence and magnitude of hot spots of methane flux in constructed wetlands

Atmospheric sciences · Biology · Disturbance (geology · Flux (metallurgy · Geography · Geomorphology · Geotechnical engineering · Hydrology (agriculture · Methane · Spots · Water level · Wetland · Chemistry · Environmental Science · Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology · Ecology · Geology · Soil Science

  • Beyond CO2 equivalence

    Open Access•Kathleen A Mar, Charlotte Unger et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2022

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae