Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A national estimate of U.S. underground natural gas storage incident emissions

Bibliographic Data

ID15548147
AuthorsZhongju Li (0000-0002-1800-8006, Environmental Defense Fund, corresponding author), Patricia M B Saint‐Vincent (0000-0001-6360-8206, National Energy Technology Laboratory), Patricia M B Saint-Vincent, Mumbi Mundia-Howe (National Energy Technology Laboratory), Natalie J Pekney (0000-0002-3198-786X, National Energy Technology Laboratory)
Year2022
Volume17
Issue8
Pages084013-084013
Publication date2022-07-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ac8069
OpenAlexW4285088670
LanguageEN
References cited24

The 2015 Aliso Canyon storage well blowout was widely reported as the worst natural gas leak in the history of the United States (U.S.) and released ∼0.1 million metric tons of methane (CH 4 ), a potent greenhouse gas. Although storage well fugitive emissions are estimated in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s annual Greenhouse Gas Inventory, the inventory does not include historical estimates of anomalous large emission events other than Aliso Canyon or smaller incident related CH 4 releases. A total of 129 underground natural gas storage (UGS) incident-related events between 1940 and 2016 were compiled from various federal/state agencies and literature reviews. Incident emissions were estimated based on best available information, such as direct operator reports, the monetary cost of gas lost, or modeling of the escaping gas at sonic speeds. There are 387 active UGS fields in three types of reservoirs: salt caverns, aquifers, and depleted oil and gas (O&G) fields. 65% of events were in the depleted O&G fields, which account for 79% of storage fields. Texas recorded the highest number of incidents (20), 14 of which were in salt dome reservoirs. The incident emissions showed a heavy-tailed emission pattern with CH 4 releases up to 29 billion cubic feet (8.2 × 10 8 m 3 ). The top seven events contributed 98% of the total estimated/measured CH 4 emissions

Canyon · Fossil fuel · Fugitive emissions · Greenhouse gas · Hydrology (agriculture · Methane · Natural gas · Tonne · Waste management · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Chemistry · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Coal Properties and Utilization · Engineering · Environmental Science · Environmental Engineering · Geology

  • Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain

    Open Access•Ramón A Alvarez, Daniel Zavala‐Araiza et al.•Science•2018

  • A Critical Review of the Risks to Water Resources from Unconventional Shale Gas Development and Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States

    Avner Vengosh, Robert B Jackson et al.•Environmental Science & Technology•2014

  • Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites in Alberta, Canada

    Open Access•Daniel Zavala‐Araiza, Scott C Herndon et al.•Elementa Science of the…•2018

  • Methane emissions from underground gas storage in California

    Open Access•Andrew K Thorpe, Riley Duren et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • A national assessment of underground natural gas storage

    Open Access•Drew R Michanowicz, Jonathan J Buonocore et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae