I am the one responsible’
The gendered reality of clean cooking fuel affordability in Shirati, Tanzania
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 15548290 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Annelise Gill‐Wiehl (0000-0002-3908-7903, Columbia University, autor de correspondencia), Shelly Ogoya (Dar Al-Shifa Hospital), Na'Zyia Dowdy-Arnold (Spelman College), Na’Zyia S Dowdy-Arnold, Indrajit Ray (0000-0002-9966-8822, University of California, Berkeley) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 20 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 064037-064037 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-05-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Environmental Research Letters (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326 |
| Editorial | IOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/add7ed |
| OpenAlex | W4410335478 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 40 |
Affordability remains one of the most significant barriers to the exclusive use of clean cookstoves and fuels, a top global health, energy, and development priority. The measurement and discussion of clean fuel affordability is almost always based on the unitary, or single decision-maker, household as the unit of analysis, although the more realistic household disaggregated into its individual decision-makers is a well-established literature. The limited work on intra-household dynamics in clean cooking cannot reveal who is buying the stove or fuel and at what true cost. Following an experiment testing the effect of microsavings to increase clean fuel consumption in Shirati, a rural town in Mara region, Tanzania, we conducted 90 interviews and numerous focus groups/budget games with a stratified random sample of mostly female main cooks. Drawing on over two years of fieldwork, we investigate the range of household needs, the role of gender in household finances, and how these combine to determine cooking fuel purchases. We find distinct and gendered financial domains where spouses do not disclose their expenses to one another and are responsible for different categories of needs. Cooking fuel is firmly in the female domain. Thus, liquefied petroleum gas affordability is constrained by these gendered financial domains, as women must choose between using savings for daily necessities or refilling the gas. Our extensive ethnographic evidence demonstrates the inappropriateness of the unitary model for cooking fuel affordability and the implications of ignoring separate-account household models. Our work requires new interpretations of saving for, and affordability of, clean fuels that the clean cooking literature has yet to confront. We offer recommendations for how the clean cooking literature could measure affordability and design policy for regions where cooking fuel is exclusively in the female financial domain
Business · Economics · Natural resource economics · Political science · Socioeconomics · Tanzania · Energy and Environment Impacts · Environmental Science
Up in Smoke
Clean fuels for resource-poor settings
Nash-Bargained Household Decisions
Rural Hausa
The value of community technology workers for LPG use
Marriage and Household Decision-Making
Spousal Control and Intra-Household Decision Making
Determinants of Cookstoves and Fuel Choice Among Rural Households in India
Enhancing clean cooking options in peri-urban Kenya
Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries
Dynamics of sustained use and abandonment of clean cooking systems
Perceptions of Improved Biomass and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Stoves in Puno, Peru
A geospatial approach to understanding clean cooking challenges in sub-Saharan Africa
Examining urban household energy consumption patterns in Mozambique through a gendered lens
Affording a clean stack
Program interventions, intrahousehold distribution and the welfare of individuals
Cleaning house
Gender Issues in Rural Household Economics
Separate Spheres Bargaining and the Marriage Market
How Serious is the Neglect of Intra-Household Inequality
Grounded theory research
Women and Rural Development Policies
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |