Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rapidly changing high-latitude seasonality

Implications for the 21st century carbon cycle in Alaska

Bibliographic Data

ID15548340
AuthorsIan Shirley (0000-0002-2229-1414, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, corresponding author), Z A Mekonnen (0000-0002-2647-0671, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), R F Grant (0000-0002-8890-6231, University of Alberta), Baptiste Dafflon (0000-0001-9871-5650, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Susan S Hubbard (0000-0003-2966-5631, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), W J Riley (0000-0002-4615-2304, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory)
Year2021
Volume17
Issue1
Pages014032-014032
Publication date2021-12-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ac4362
OpenAlexW4200298778
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited75

Seasonal variations in high-latitude terrestrial carbon (C) fluxes are predominantly driven by air temperature and radiation. At present, high-latitude net C uptake is largest during the summer. Recent observations and modeling studies have demonstrated that ongoing and projected climate change will increase plant productivity, microbial respiration, and growing season lengths at high-latitudes, but impacts on high-latitude C cycle seasonality (and potential feedbacks to the climate system) remain uncertain. Here we use ecosys , a well-tested and process-rich mechanistic ecosystem model that we evaluate further in this study, to explore how climate warming under an RCP8.5 scenario will shift C cycle seasonality in Alaska throughout the 21st century. The model successfully reproduced recently reported large high-latitude C losses during the fall and winter and yet still predicts a high-latitude C sink, pointing to a resolution of the current conflict between process-model and observation-based estimates of high-latitude C balance. We find that warming will result in surprisingly large changes in net ecosystem exchange (NEE; defined as negative for uptake) seasonality, with spring net C uptake overtaking summer net C uptake by year 2100. This shift is driven by a factor of 3 relaxation of spring temperature limitation to plant productivity that results in earlier C uptake and a corresponding increase in magnitude of spring NEE from −19 to −144 gC m −2 season −1 by the end of the century. Although a similar relaxation of temperature limitation will occur in the fall, radiation limitation during those months will limit increases in C fixation. Additionally, warmer soil temperatures and increased carbon inputs from plants lead to combined fall and winter C losses (163 gC m −2 ) that are larger than summer net uptake (123 gC m −2 season −1 ) by year 2100. However, this increase in microbial activity leads to more rapid N cycling and increased plant N uptake during the fall and winter months that supports large increases in spring NPP. Due to the large increases in spring net C uptake, the high-latitude atmospheric C sink is projected to sustain throughout this century. Our analysis disentangles the effects of key environmental drivers of high-latitude seasonal C balances as climate changes over the 21st century

Atmospheric sciences · Biology · Carbon sink · Climate change · Climatology · Ecosystem · Geography · Growing season · Latitude · Primary production · Seasonality · Sink (geography · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate change and permafrost · Climate variability and models · Environmental Science · Ecology

  • Changes in high-latitude surface energy balance driven by snowpack and vegetation dynamics under warmer climate

    Open Access•Z A Mekonnen, W J Riley et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Comparing assumptions and applications of dynamic vegetation models used in the Arctic-Boreal zone of Alaska and Canada

    Open Access•Elise Heffernan, Howard E Epstein et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • Hydrology controls thermokarst and alters carbon cycling and methane emissions in peatlands near the southern limit of permafrost

    Open Access•Ian Shirley, Z A Mekonnen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Machine learning models inaccurately predict current and future high-latitude C balances

    Open Access•Ian Shirley, Z A Mekonnen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991

    Open Access•Ranga B Myneni, Charles D Keeling et al.•Nature•1997

  • Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback

    Open Access•E A G Schuur, Angel Ribes Pons et al.•Nature•2015

  • Are treelines advancing? A global meta‐analysis of treeline response to climate warming

    Open Access•Melanie A Harsch, Philip E Hulme et al.•Ecology Letters•2009

  • A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species

    Open Access•Graham D Farquhar, Susanne von Caemmerer et al.•Planta•1980

  • Estimating and tracking the remaining carbon budget for stringent climate targets

    Open Access•Joeri Rogelj, Piers Forster et al.•Nature•2019

  • Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification

    Open Access•Mark C Serreze, Roger G Barry•Global and Planetary Change•2011

  • Effects of excess ground ice on projections of permafrost in a warming climate

    Open Access•Hanna Lee, Sean Swenson et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2014

  • St century tundra shrubification could enhance net carbon uptake of North America Arctic tundra under an RCP8.5 climate trajectory

    Open Access•Z A Mekonnen, W J Riley et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Non-growing season plant nutrient uptake controls Arctic tundra vegetation composition under future climate

    Open Access•W J Riley, Z A Mekonnen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Key indicators of Arctic climate change

    Open Access•Jason E Box, William Colgan et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Earlier springs decrease peak summer productivity in North American boreal forests

    Open Access•Wolfgang Buermann, Parida R Bikash et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2013

  • Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections

    Open Access•William R Wieder, Cory C Cleveland et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • Permafrost thaw and resulting soil moisture changes regulate projected high-latitude CO 2 and CH 4 emissions

    Open Access•David M Lawrence, Charles D Koven et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • Changes in precipitation and air temperature contribute comparably to permafrost degradation in a warmer climate

    Open Access•Z A Mekonnen, W J Riley et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Status and trends in Arctic vegetation

    Open Access•Anne D Bjorkman, Mariana García Criado et al.•AMBIO•2020

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae