Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Implications of an emission trading scheme for India’s net-zero strategy

A modelling-based assessment

Bibliographic Data

ID15548494
AuthorsAman Malik (0000-0002-7310-8448, Council on Energy, Environment and Water, corresponding author), Vaibhav Chaturvedi (0000-0001-5370-8772, Council on Energy, Environment and Water), Medhavi Sandhani (0009-0004-5652-6121, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi), Pallavi Das (0009-0009-3716-327X, Council on Energy, Environment and Water), Chetna Arora (0009-0007-0532-6009, Council on Energy, Environment and Water), Nishtha Singh, Ryna Cui (0000-0002-1186-8230, University of Maryland, College Park), Gokul Iyer (0000-0002-3565-7526, Joint Global Change Research Institute), Alicia Zhao (0000-0002-6054-8671, University of Maryland, College Park)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue8
Pages084043-084043
Publication date2024-07-18
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ad64ec
OpenAlexW4400763288
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

To help meet its near-term NDC goals and long-term net-zero 2070 target, the Government of India has planned to establish a Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), i.e. a domestic emission trading scheme (ETS). An ETS is an inherently cost-effective policy instrument for emission reduction, providing the greatest flexibility to reduce emissions from within and across sectors. An effective ETS requires design features that consider country-specific challenges and reflect its role within the larger policy package to achieve long-term emission reduction. Within the Indian context and in this study we therefore investigate—(i) what might be the role of the ETS in achieving India’s long-term mitigation targets? (ii) How might the various sectors interact under an emissions cap? (iii) How might the ETS interact with existing energy and climate policies? We do this analysis by running four main scenarios using the integrated assessment model GCAM (v6.0), adapted to India-specific assumptions and expectations. These scenarios are—(i) NZ (net-zero), (ii) NZ + ETS, (iii) NZ + CC (command and control), and (iv) NZ + RPO (renewables purchase obligations) + ETS. The NZ scenario assumes India’s near-term and long-term climate commitments of net zero by 2070. Scenarios with ETS (ii) and (iv) apply an emissions cap on four sectors—electricity, iron and steel, cement, and fertilizer. The scenario with CC applies a homogenous emission cap on each of the chosen sectors but does not allow cross-sectoral trading. The last scenario includes renewables purchase obligations (RPOs along with an ETS. We show that under a specific ETS emissions cap: (i) the electricity sector emerges as the largest source of cost-effective greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction options; (ii) ETS with trading across sectors is around 24% more cost-effective than ETS with trading only within sectors, (iii) RPOs can be complementary to an ETS although the impact of RPOs on GHG reductions in the electricity sector would need to be considered when setting the level of the ETS cap (or emissions intensity targets) or the RPO targets to avoid low carbon prices, and (iv) the direction and volume of financial transfers across sectors depends on allocation targets set by the government. Based on these results we provide design recommendations for India’s ETS

Business · Climate change · Context (archaeology · Economics · Emissions trading · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Renewable energy · Scenario analysis · Term (time · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Environmental Science · Finance

  • Navigating India’s Carbon Credit Trading Scheme

    Open Access•Hrishikesh Upadhyaya, Moirangthem Momocha Singh•ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and…•2026

  • Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change—and how “sustainability transition policy” can help

    Open Access•Daniel Rosenbloom, Jochen Markard et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • The contribution of Paris to limit global warming to 2 °C

    Open Access•Gokul Iyer, Gokul C Iyer et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2015

  • Stranded asset implications of the Paris Agreement in Latin America and the Caribbean

    Open Access•Matthew Binsted, Gokul Iyer et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • A tale of two market failures

    Open Access•Adam B Jaffe, Richard G Newell et al.•Ecological Economics•2005

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae