Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Warmer climate projections in EC-Earth3-Veg

The role of changes in the greenhouse gas concentrations from CMIP5 to CMIP6

Bibliographic Data

ID15548581
AuthorsKlaus Wyser (0000-0001-9752-3454, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, corresponding author), Erik Kjellström (0000-0002-6495-1038, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute), Torben Koenigk (0000-0003-2051-743X, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute), Helena Martins (0000-0002-7311-6819, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute), Ralf Döscher (0000-0003-0174-3693, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute)
Year2020
Volume15
Issue5
Pages054020-054020
Publication date2020-03-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab81c2
OpenAlexW3010957754
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited15

Climate projections for the 21st century for CMIP6 are warmer than those for CMIP5 despite nominally identical instantaneous radiative forcing. Many climate modeling groups attribute the stronger warming in the CMIP6 projections to the higher climate sensitivity of the new generation of climate models, but here we demonstrate that also changes in the forcing datasets can play an important role, in particular the prescribed concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) that are used to force the models. In the EC-Earth3-Veg model the effective radiative forcing (ERF) is reduced by 1.4 W m −2 when the GHG concentrations from SSP5-8.5 (used in CMIP6) are replaced by the GHG concentrations from RCP8.5 (used in CMIP5), and similar yet smaller reductions are seen for the SSP2-4.5/RCP4.5 and SSP1-2.6/RCP2.6 scenario pairs. From the reduced ERF we can estimate the temperature at the end of the century in a full climate simulation with the CMIP6 version of the EC-Earth model but using CMIP5 GHG concentrations instead. For the new SSP5-8.5 and SSP2-4.5 scenarios we find that 50% or more of the temperature increase from CMIP5 to CMIP6 at the end of the century is due to changes in the prescribed GHG concentrations. The implication is that CMIP5 and CMIP6 projections for the 21st century are difficult to compare with each other not only as models differ but also as the forcing conditions are not equal. Therefore, the communication of CMIP6 results to the impact, mitigation and adaptation communities has to be carefully formulated, taking into account the role of the updated GHG concentrations when interpreting the warmer climate projections for the 21st century

Atmospheric sciences · Climate change · Climate model · Climate sensitivity · Climatology · Cloud forcing · Coupled model intercomparison project · Forcing (mathematics · Global warming · Greenhouse gas · Physics · Radiative forcing · Radiative transfer · Representative Concentration Pathways · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols · Climate variability and models · Environmental Science · Geology

  • Stable Decisions in Unstable Climates

    Open Access•Amir Mohammad Najafpour, Marzieh Momeni et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2026

  • The fate of the Caspian Sea under projected climate change and water extraction during the 21st century

    Open Access•Sifan A Koriche, Joy Singarayer et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • How academic research and news media cover climate change

    Open Access•Pablo A Cortés, Riva Quiroga•Frontiers in Communication•2023

  • Mapping global human thermal comfort

    Open Access•Jing Zheng, Yaxing Du et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2025

  • Can the Carbon Emissions Trading System Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity of the Pilot Cities?—A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Econometric Analysis in China

    Open Access•Dawei Huang, Gang Chen•International Journal of…•2022

  • Changes to population-based emergence of climate change from CMIP5 to CMIP6

    Open Access•Hunter Douglas, Luke J Harrington et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization

    Open Access•Veronika Eyring, Sandrine Bony et al.•Geoscientific Model Development•2016

  • Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6

    Open Access•Matthew Gidden, Keywan Riahi et al.•Geoscientific Model Development•2019

  • The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment

    Open Access•Richard H Moss, Jae Edmonds et al.•Nature•2010

  • The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6

    Open Access•Brian C O''Neill, Claudia Tebaldi et al.•Geoscientific Model Development•2016

  • How will climate change shape climate opinion

    Open Access•P David Howe, Jennifer R Marlon et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications

    Open Access•Keywan Riahi, Detlef P Van Vuuren et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1.2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae