Advancements and opportunities to improve bottom–up estimates of global wetland methane emissions

Wetlands are the single largest natural source of atmospheric methane (CH 4 ), contributing approximately 30% of total surface CH 4 emissions, and they have been identified as the largest source of uncertainty in the global CH 4 budget based on the most recent Global Carbon Project CH 4 report. High uncertainties in the bottom–up estimates of wetland CH 4 emissions pose significant challenges for accurately understanding their spatiotemporal variations, and for the scientific community to monitor wetland CH 4 emissions from space. In fact, there are large disagreements between bottom–up estimates versus top–down estimates inferred from inversion of atmospheric CH 4 concentrations. To address these critical gaps, we review recent development, validation, and applications of bottom–up estimates of global wetland CH 4 emissions, as well as how they are used in top–down inversions. These bottom–up estimates, using (1) empirical biogeochemical modeling (e.g. WetCHARTs: 125–208 TgCH 4 yr −1 ); (2) process-based biogeochemical modeling (e.g. WETCHIMP: 190 ± 39 TgCH 4 yr −1 ); and (3) data-driven machine learning approach (e.g. UpCH4: 146 ± 43 TgCH 4 yr −1 ). Bottom–up estimates are subject to significant uncertainties (∼80 Tg CH 4 yr −1 ), and the ranges of different estimates do not overlap, further amplifying the overall uncertainty when combining multiple data products. These substantial uncertainties highlight gaps in our understanding of wetland CH 4 biogeochemistry and wetland inundation dynamics. Major tropical and arctic wetland complexes are regional hotspots of CH 4 emissions. However, the scarcity of satellite data over the tropics and northern high latitudes offer limited information for top–down inversions to improve bottom–up estimates. Recent advances in surface measurements of CH 4 fluxes (e.g. FLUXNET-CH 4 ) across a wide range of ecosystems including bogs, fens, marshes, and forest swamps provide an unprecedented opportunity to improve existing bottom–up estimates of wetland CH 4 estimates. We suggest that continuous long-term surface measurements at representative wetlands, high fidelity wetland mapping, combined with an appropriate modeling framework, will be needed to significantly improve global estimates of wetland CH 4 emissions. There is also a pressing unmet need for fine-resolution and high-precision satellite CH 4 observations directed at wetlands

Atmospheric methane · Earth science · Environmental resource management · Greenhouse gas · Methane · Methane emissions · Wetland · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Climate variability and models · Environmental Science · Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology · Ecology · Geology · Oceanography

• Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth‐generation global fire emissions database (GFED4)

  Open Access•Louis Giglio, James T Randerson et al.•Journal of Geophysical Research:…•2013

  Incluir item

• Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands

  Open Access•Bernhard Lehner, Peter Doll et al.•Journal of Hydrology•2004

  Incluir item

• The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017

  Open Access•Marielle Saunois, Ann R Stavert et al.•Earth System Science Data•2020

  Incluir item

• Global wetland contribution to 2000–2012 atmospheric methane growth rate dynamics

  Open Access•Benjamin Poulter, Philippe Bousquet et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  Incluir item

• Machine learning models inaccurately predict current and future high-latitude C balances

  Open Access•Ian Shirley, Z A Mekonnen et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  Incluir item

• Critical needs to close monitoring gaps in pan-tropical wetland CH 4 emissions

  Open Access•Qing Zhu, Kunxiaojia Yuan et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  Incluir item