Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Characterizing and communicating uncertainty

Lessons from Nasa’s Carbon Monitoring System

Bibliographic Data

ID15549546
AuthorsRobert E Kennedy (0000-0002-5507-474X, Oregon State University, corresponding author), Sylvia Serbin (0000-0003-4136-8971, Goddard Space Flight Center), Michael C Dietze (0000-0002-2324-2518, Boston University), Hans‐Erik Andersen (Pacific Northwest Research Station), Hans-Erik Andersen (0000-0002-5546-9522), Chad Babcock (0000-0001-9597-4462, University of Minnesota), D F Baker (0000-0003-4144-4946, Colorado State University), Molly E Brown (0000-0001-7384-3314, University of Maryland, College Park), K J Davis (0000-0002-1992-8381, Pennsylvania State University), Laura Duncanson (0000-0003-4031-3493, University of Maryland, College Park), Sha Feng (0000-0002-2376-0868, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Andrew T Hudak (0000-0001-7480-1458, Rocky Mountain Research Station), Junjie Liu (0009-0002-6907-3470, Jet Propulsion Laboratory), Paul L Patterson (Rocky Mountain Research Station), Brett Raczka (0000-0003-0582-1118, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research), Mark A Cochrane (0000-0002-4573-568X, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science), E Sepulveda Carlo (0000-0002-7650-7970, Goddard Space Flight Center), Edil A Sepúlveda Carlo, Rodrigo Vargas (0000-0001-6829-5333, University of Delaware)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue12
Pages123003-123003
Publication date2024-10-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ad8be0
OpenAlexW4403819383
LanguageEN
References cited51

Navigating uncertainty is a critical challenge in all fields of science, especially when translating knowledge into real-world policies or management decisions. However, the wide variance in concepts and definitions of uncertainty across scientific fields hinders effective communication. As a microcosm of diverse fields within Earth Science, NASA’s Carbon Monitoring System (CMS) provides a useful crucible in which to identify cross-cutting concepts of uncertainty. The CMS convened the Uncertainty Working Group (UWG), a group of specialists across disciplines, to evaluate and synthesize efforts to characterize uncertainty in CMS projects. This paper represents efforts by the UWG to build a heuristic framework designed to evaluate data products and communicate uncertainty to both scientific and non-scientific end users. We consider four pillars of uncertainty: origins, severity, stochasticity versus incomplete knowledge, and spatial and temporal autocorrelation. Using a common vocabulary and a generalized workflow, the framework introduces a graphical heuristic accompanied by a narrative, exemplified through contrasting case studies. Envisioned as a versatile tool, this framework provides clarity in reporting uncertainty, guiding users and tempering expectations. Beyond CMS, it stands as a simple yet powerful means to communicate uncertainty across diverse scientific communities

Astrobiology · Carbon cycle · Carbon fibers · Ecosystem · Environmental resource management · Physics · Remote sensing · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations · Ecology · Geology

  • Communicating scientific uncertainty

    Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff, Alex Davis et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2014

  • Defining Uncertainty

    Warren E Walker, Poul Harremoës et al.•Integrated Assessment•2003

  • Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents

    Open Access•Sassan Saatchi, Sassan S Saatchi et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2011

  • The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections

    Open Access•Claudia Tebaldi, Reto Knutti•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2007

  • Global Carbon Budget 2019

    Open Access•Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W Jones et al.•Earth System Science Data•2019

  • Statistical properties of hybrid estimators proposed for Gedi—Nasa’s global ecosystem dynamics investigation

    Open Access•Paul L Patterson, SEAN P HEALEY et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Specifying geospatial data product characteristics for forest and fuel management applications

    Open Access•Arjan J H Meddens, Michelle M Steen-Adams et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • The Nasa Carbon Monitoring System Phase 2 synthesis

    Open Access•G C Hurtt, A E Andrews et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • An empirical, integrated forest biomass monitoring system

    Open Access•Robert E Kennedy, Janet L Ohmann et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Comparing sources of uncertainty in community greenhouse gas estimation techniques

    Open Access•Michael Blackhurst, H Scott Matthews•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • A carbon monitoring system for mapping regional, annual aboveground biomass across the northwestern USA

    Open Access•Andrew T Hudak, Patrick A Fekety et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Nasa’s carbon monitoring system (CMS) and arctic-boreal vulnerability experiment (ABoVE) social network and community of practice

    Open Access•Molly E Brown, Matthew Cooper et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • The ambiguities of uncertainty

    Open Access•Luke D Bevan•Futures•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae