Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ecological restoration and rising CO 2 enhance the carbon sink, counteracting climate change in northeastern China

Bibliographic Data

ID15549600
AuthorsBinbin Huang (0000-0003-3978-4028, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Fei Lu (0000-0002-8995-4550, Chinese Academy of Sciences, corresponding author), Xiaoke Wang (0000-0002-2421-3970, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Xing Wu (0000-0003-2485-9007, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Lu Zhang (0000-0002-8855-8492, Chinese Academy of Sciences, corresponding author), Zhiyun Ouyang (0000-0003-0927-0499, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Year2021
Volume17
Issue1
Pages014002-014002
Publication date2021-11-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ac3871
OpenAlexW3212546445
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited89

The impact of climate change, rising CO 2 , land-use/land-cover change and land management on the carbon cycle in terrestrial ecosystems has been widely reported. However, only rarely have studies have been conducted to clarify the impact of climate change and rising CO 2 on the carbon sink contributed by ecological restoration projects (ERPs). To better understand the impact of climate change and rising CO 2 on ERPs, we took the Beijing–Tianjin Sand Source Control Project zone as an example to set up different scenarios to distinguish the confounding effects of these factors on the regional carbon budget based on a remote sensing data-driven model. Compared with business as usual, our results show that climate change caused a carbon loss of 78.97 Tg C. On the contrary, ERPs contributed a carbon sink of approximately 199.88 Tg C in forest and grassland. Furthermore, rising CO 2 also contributed an additional carbon sink of 107.80 Tg C. This study distinguished the individual effects of different factors, and clarified the net carbon sink contributed by ERPs and rising CO 2 and their significance for enhancing the regional carbon sink and reversing the adverse effects of climate change on the carbon sink. Furthermore, ERPs can sequester carbon more effectively and faster compared with rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration

Carbon cycle · Carbon sink · Climate change · Ecosystem · Geography · Global warming · Greenhouse gas · Land use · Land use, land-use change and forestry · Sink (geography · Cryospheric studies and observations · Environmental Science · Fire effects on ecosystems · Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics · Ecology

  • Forest aging limits future carbon sink in China

    Open Access•Yi Leng, Wei Li et al.•One Earth•2024

  • Grain for Green Project dominates greening in afforested areas rather than that in grass revegetation areas of the Loess Plateau, China—using Deep Crossing LSTM Age network

    Open Access•Xueting Wang, Honglin He et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests

    Open Access•William R L Anderegg, Anna T Trugman et al.•Science•2020

  • Global forest restoration and the importance of prioritizing local communities

    Open Access•James T Erbaugh, Nabin Pradhan et al.•Nature Ecology & Evolution•2020

  • Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010

    Open Access•Fei Lu, Huifeng Hu et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2018

  • Carbon emissions from land-use change and management in China between 1990 and 2010

    Open Access•Li Sze Lai, Li Lai et al.•Science Advances•2016

  • Soil erosion and the global carbon budget

    Open Access•Rattan Lal•Environment International•2003

  • Global Carbon Budget 2019

    Open Access•Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W Jones et al.•Earth System Science Data•2019

  • Terrestrial ecosystem production

    Open Access•Christopher Potter, Christopher S Potter et al.•Global Biogeochemical Cycles•1993

  • Land cover change, landscape degradation, and restoration along a railway line in the Amazon biome, Brazil

    Open Access•Diogo Corrêa Santos, Pedro Walfir Martins E Souza Filho et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2020

  • China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management

    Open Access•Chi Chen, Taejin Park et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Ecological restoration impact on total terrestrial water storage

    Open Access•Meng Zhao, A Geruo et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Influences of afforestation policies on soil moisture content in China’s arid and semi-arid regions

    Open Access•Jianjun Cao, Hong Tian et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae