Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Macroplastic deposition and flushing in the Meuse river following the July 2021 European floods

Bibliographic Data

ID15550320
AuthorsRahel Hauk (0000-0002-2546-8764, Wageningen University & Research, corresponding author), Tim van Emmerik (0000-0002-4773-9107, Wageningen University & Research), Martine van der Ploeg (0000-0002-3172-7339, Wageningen University & Research), Winnie de Winter (0000-0002-2333-5650), Marijke Boonstra (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment), Ansje Löhr (0000-0001-5093-9401, Open University of the Netherlands), Adriaan J Teuling (0000-0003-4302-2835, Wageningen University & Research)
Year2023
Volume18
Issue12
Pages124025-124025
Publication date2023-10-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ad0768
OpenAlexW4388194825
LanguageEN
References cited21

Rivers play an important role in the macroplastics transport and retention dynamics in the environment. Therefore, gaining an understanding of these processes is vital in order to help determine the fate of macroplastic in the environment. During flood events the transport of floating macroplastic is known to increase. We compared plastic accumulation and flushing on sixteen riverbanks along the Dutch Meuse river during the period that includes the July 2021 extreme flood to plastic accumulation on the same riverbanks as during normal discharge conditions between 2018 and 2021. Here we show that following the flood small macroplastic categories ( < 2.5 cm) were flushed from the riverbanks, while larger soft plastic fragments (2.5–50 cm) and wet tissues were deposited. We found that for all plastic categories and for all riverbanks averaged, the plastic accumulation rate during the July 2021 flood was higher than that which would be expected for that time of year. However, the average accumulation rate for all locations during the period that included the flood was lower than the average accumulation rate over the Dutch winter (Oct/Nov–Feb/Mar). Our results show that litter category composition following the July 2021 flood differed from normal conditions. This indicates that plastic deposition and remobilization processes on riverbanks differ between extreme flood and annually average conditions. These observations contribute to a better understanding of the fate of macroplastic in the environment in terms of the drivers of both its transport and deposition

Archaeology · Atmospheric sciences · Biology · Deposition (geology · Flood myth · Flushing · Geography · Geomorphology · Hydrology (agriculture · Litter · Physical geography · Sediment · Environmental Science · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Ecology · Geology

  • Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made

    Open Access•Roland Geyer, Jenna Jambeck et al.•Science Advances•2017

  • Flood risk and climate change

    Zbigniew W Kundzewicz, Shinjiro Kanae et al.•Hydrological Sciences Journal•2014

  • Plastic in global rivers

    Open Access•Caspar T J Roebroek, Shaun Harrigan et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Riverbank macrolitter in the Dutch Rhine–Meuse delta

    Open Access•Tim van Emmerik, Caspar T J Roebroek et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae