Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Metrics for quantifying the efficiency of atmospheric CO 2 reduction by marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR)

Bibliographic Data

ID15550765
AuthorsK Yamamoto (0009-0007-3151-9234, corresponding author), Tim DeVries (0000-0002-7771-9430), David A Siegel (0000-0003-1619-6119)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue10
Pages104053-104053
Publication date2024-08-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ad7477
OpenAlexW4401936577
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited40

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is gaining interest as a tool to meet global climate goals. Because the response of the ocean–atmosphere system to mCDR takes years to centuries, modeling is required to assess the impact of mCDR on atmospheric CO 2 reduction. Here, we use a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to quantify the atmospheric CO 2 reduction in response to a CDR perturbation. We define two metrics to characterize the atmospheric CO 2 response to both instantaneous ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) and direct air capture (DAC): the cumulative additionality ( α ) measures the reduction in atmospheric CO 2 relative to the magnitude of the CDR perturbation, while the relative efficiency ( ε ) quantifies the cumulative additionality of mCDR relative to that of DAC. For DAC, α is 100% immediately following CDR deployment, but declines to roughly 50% by 100 years post-deployment as the ocean degasses CO 2 in response to the removal of carbon from the atmosphere. For instantaneous OAE, α is zero initially and reaches a maximum of 40%–90% several years to decades later, depending on regional CO 2 equilibration rates and ocean circulation processes. The global mean ε approaches 100% after 40 years, showing that instantaneous OAE is nearly as effective as DAC after several decades. However, there are significant geographic variations, with ε approaching 100% most rapidly in the low latitudes while ε stays well under 100% for decades to centuries near deep and intermediate water formation sites. These metrics provide a quantitative framework for evaluating sequestration timescales and carbon market valuation that can be applied to any mCDR strategy

Atmospheric sciences · Biology · Carbon dioxide · Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere · Reduction (mathematics · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Atmospheric Ozone and Climate · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Environmental Science · Mathematics · Ecology · Geology

  • Efficacy of individual and combined terrestrial and marine carbon dioxide removal

    Open Access•Anusha Sathyanadh, H Esfandiari et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2025

  • NCEP–DOE Amip-II Reanalysis (R-2)

    Masao Kanamitsu, Wesley Ebisuzaki et al.•Bulletin of the American…•2002

  • Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization

    Open Access•Keywan Riahi, Arnulf Grübler et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2007

  • Global Carbon Budget 2023

    Open Access•Pierre Friedlingstein, Mike O’Sullivan et al.•Earth System Science Data•2023

  • Assessing the sequestration time scales of some ocean-based carbon dioxide reduction strategies

    Open Access•David A Siegel, Tim DeVries et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Geoengineering impact of open ocean dissolution of olivine on atmospheric CO 2 , surface ocean pH and marine biology

    Open Access•Peter Köhler, Jesse F Abrams et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2013

  • Assessing the effective settling of mineral particles in the ocean with application to ocean-based carbon-dioxide removal

    Open Access•Adam J K Yang, Mary‐louise Timmermans•Environmental Research Letters•2024

  • A biogeochemical model of mineral-based ocean alkalinity enhancement

    Open Access•Mojtaba Fakhraee, Zijian Li et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Negative emissions—Part 2

    Open Access•Sabine Fuss, William F Lamb et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae