Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Herders’ willingness to accept versus the public sector’s willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia, China

Bibliographic Data

ID15551300
AuthorsLin Zhen (0000-0001-6227-4697, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, corresponding author), F Li (0000-0001-9835-375X, Shenzhen Institute of Building Research (China), corresponding author), Huimin Yan (0000-0003-0678-0397, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research), H M Yan, G H Liu (Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning, corresponding author), J Y Liu (0000-0002-7797-9814, Chinese Academy of Sciences, corresponding author), H Y Zhang (0009-0002-8451-9952), Hongqiu Zhang (Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences), Bin Du (0000-0001-6237-2895, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research), B Z Du, Rui Wu (0000-0001-9658-1695, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research), R Z Wu, Chongyu Sun (Chinese Academy of Sciences), C Z Sun, Chenye Wang (0009-0003-6014-3396, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Year2014
Volume9
Issue4
Pages045003-045003
Publication date2014-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045003
OpenAlexW2055966761
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited42

This paper describes two payment for ecosystem services (PES) programs to restore grassland ecosystems in Inner Mongolia in Northern China. A key challenge is to sustain the livelihood of local residents, who earn most of their income from traditional animal husbandry. We surveyed 240 herders and 36 government representatives in 2 years. We used contingent valuation and logistic regression to analyze the resulting data. Since the PES implementation, income from cultivation and animal grazing decreased, whereas income from compensation and off-farm activities increased. The herders preferred an annual payment of 625 Chinese yuan (CNY ) ha-1 for participating in conservation activities, but the government prefers to provide 528 CNY ha-1, resulting in an annual gap of 97 CNY ha-1. The current too-low payments may lead some herders to expand their grazing into restricted grassland or increase their number of animals, particularly if either payment program ends. The herders were most concerned about their economic loss, whereas the government considered both grassland restoration and income protection to be important. To create an improved and sustainable PES scheme, we recommend solutions that will let the herders sustain their livelihood while conserving the grasslands. Our findings will help to establish more effective PES schemes for the grasslands of Inner Mongolia and similar regions

Agricultural economics · Agriculture · Business · China · Direct Payments · Economics · Ecosystem · Ecosystem services · Geography · Government (linguistics · Grassland · Household income · Livelihood · Natural resource economics · Payment · Payment for ecosystem services · Socioeconomics · Willingness to accept · Willingness to pay · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology · Finance

  • Land parcellation reduced spatial redundancy resulting in grassland degradation

    Open Access•JianXin Jiao, Shanshan Li et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Valor de conservación en bosques de comunidades indígenas

    Open Access•Gabriel Alarcón Aguirre, José Dante Gutiérrez Alberoni•Revista de Investigaciones…•2018

  • China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency

    Open Access•Brett A Bryan, Lei Gao et al.•Nature•2018

  • Earth science and the integral climatic and socio-economic drivers of change across northern Eurasia

    Open Access•A J Soja, Amber Soja et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Assessing the effects of ecological restoration approaches in the alpine rangelands of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

    Open Access•Lin Zhen, Bingzhen Du et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Restoration of gold-mined degraded land for a sustainable environment and food production

    Open Access•Ridwan Mukaila, Festus Eluwande Awoyelu•World Development Perspectives•2026

  • Assessing the opportunity costs of Chinese herder compliance with a payment for environmental services scheme

    Open Access•Karl Behrendt, Colin Brown et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Effects of environmental regulation on rural livelihood diversification

    Open Access•Huanguang Qiu, Liufang Su et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2022

  • The effects of a subsidy for grassland protection on livestock numbers, grazing intensity, and herders’ income in inner Mongolia

    Open Access•Liping Gao, Henry W Kinnucan et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Blood transfusion or hematopoiesis? how to select between the subsidy mode and the long-term mode of eco-compensation

    Open Access•Moucheng Liu, Yunxiao Bai et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Socioeconomic and ecological indicators in willingness to accept compensation for the conservation of medicinal plants in a tropical dry forest

    Open Access•Marcelânio Laurentino, Elcida De Lima Araújo et al.•Environment Development and…•2022

  • Effect of Eco-compensation Schemes on Household Income Structures and Herder Satisfaction

    Open Access•Jing Zhang, Colin Brown et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • One-hundred years after shrub encroachment

    Open Access•Stefani Daryanto, Bojie Fu et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • A comparative analysis of agri-environment schemes in China, Europe and US

    Open Access•Zhengzheng Hao, Mary Nthambi•Land Use Policy•2025

  • A factor-income approach to estimating grassland protection subsidy payments to livestock herders in Inner Mongolia, China

    Open Access•Anne T Byrne, Joleen C Hadrich et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses

    Open Access•W Michael Hanemann•American Journal of Agricultural…•1984

  • Grain for Green

    Emi Uchida, Jintao Xu et al.•Land Economics•2005

  • A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation

    Open Access•John J Murphy, James J Murphy et al.•Environmental and Resource…•2005

  • Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data

    Open Access•W Michael Hanemann•American Journal of Agricultural…•1989

  • Contingent Valuation

    Richard T Carson•Environmental Science & Technology•2000

  • Economic Reasons for Conserving Wild Nature

    Open Access•Andrew Balmford, Aaron Bruner et al.•Science•2002

  • The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

    Open Access•R Costanza, Ralph C D’arge et al.•Nature•1997

  • Comparing patterns of ecosystem service consumption and perceptions of range management between ethnic herders in Inner Mongolia and Mongolia

    Open Access•Lin Zhen, Ochirbat Batkhishig et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2010

  • Effects of institutional changes on land use

    Open Access•Alexander V Prishchepov, Volker C Radeloff et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2012

  • China's sloping land conversion program

    Open Access•Michael T Bennett•Ecological Economics•2008

  • Willingness-to-pay for Borivli National Park

    Open Access•Nandini Hadker, Sudhir Sharma et al.•Ecological Economics•1997

  • Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation

    Open Access•Clive L Spash, Nick Hanley•Ecological Economics•1995

  • Mongolian nomadic culture and ecological culture

    Open Access•MunkhDalai A Zhang, Elles Borjigin et al.•Ecological Economics•2007

  • Comparing willingness-to-pay between residents and non-residents when correcting hypothetical bias

    Open Access•Juyeon Kim, Ju-Yeon Kim et al.•Ecological Economics•2012

  • Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem

    Open Access•Clive L Spash, Kevin Urama et al.•Ecological Economics•2009

  • Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice

    Open Access•Stefanie Engel, Stefano Pagiola et al.•Ecological Economics•2008

  • Can Payments for Environmental Services Help Reduce Poverty? An Exploration of the Issues and the Evidence to Date from Latin America

    Open Access•Stefano Pagiola, Agustin Arcenas et al.•World Development•2005

  • Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible

    Ronald G Cummings, S R Elliott et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1997

  • Principles for Fairness and Efficiency in Enhancing Environmental Services in Asia

    Open Access•Meine Van Noordwijk, Beria Leimona•Conservation Ecology•2010

  • Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation

    Open Access•W Michael Hanemann•The Journal of Economic…•1994

Citations per year1.5
Citation span2016 - 2026 (11)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae