Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Emissions in the stream

Estimating the greenhouse gas impacts of an oil and gas boom

Bibliographic Data

ID15552829
AuthorsAndrew Waxman (0000-0002-7804-4025, The University of Texas at Austin, corresponding author), Achmad Khomaini (The University of Texas at Austin), Benjamin D Leibowicz (0000-0003-0796-8666, The University of Texas at Austin), Sheila M Olmstead (0000-0002-9572-943X, Resources For The Future)
Year2019
Volume15
Issue1
Pages014004-014004
Publication date2019-12-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Research Letters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-9326 • E-ISSN: 1748-9326
PublisherIOP Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1088/1748-9326/ab5e6f
OpenAlexW2993932920
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited34

The Shale Revolution has stimulated a large and rapid buildout of oil and gas infrastructure in the Gulf and Southwest regions of the United States (US), expected to unfold over decades. Therefore, it is critical to develop a clearer understanding of the scale and composition of the likely greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with this activity. We compile a detailed inventory of projected upstream oil and gas production expansions as well as recently and soon-to-be built midstream and downstream facilities within the region. Using data from emissions permits, emissions factors, and facility capacities, we estimate expected GHG emissions at the facility level for facilities that have recently been constructed or are soon to be constructed. Our central estimate suggests that the total annual emissions impact of the regional oil and gas infrastructure buildout may reach 541 million tons of CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 e) by 2030, which is more than 8% of total US GHG emissions in 2017 and roughly equivalent to the emissions of 131 coal-fired power plants. A substantial fraction of the projected emissions come from petrochemical facilities (38%) and liquefied natural gas terminals (19%). Researchers have largely focused on upstream emissions such as fugitive methane (CH 4 ) associated with new US production; our findings reveal the potentially greater prominence of midstream and downstream sources in the studied region

Downstream (manufacturing · Fossil fuel · Fugitive emissions · Greenhouse gas · Liquefied natural gas · Midstream · Natural gas · Petroleum industry · Upstream (networking · Waste management · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions · Engineering · Environmental Science · Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues · Environmental Engineering

  • Climate Imagineering

    Sean Low, Sean Jiaming Low•2021

  • Delaying decarbonization

    Open Access•Sean Low, Miranda Boettcher•Earth System Governance•2020

  • The hidden costs of energy and mobility

    Open Access•B K Sovacool, Jinsoo Kim et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis

    Open Access•Thomas F Stocker•Climate Change 2013 - the…•2014

  • Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations

    Open Access•Robert W Howarth, Renee Santoro et al.•Climatic Change•2011

  • Greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption and economic growth

    Open Access•Mahamat Hamit‐Haggar, Mahamat Hamit-Haggar•Energy Economics•2012

  • Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems

    Open Access•Adam R Brandt, Garvin Heath et al.•Science•2014

  • Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain

    Open Access•Ramón A Alvarez, Daniel Zavala‐Araiza et al.•Science•2018

  • The ecoinvent Database

    Open Access•Rolf Frischknecht, Niels Jungbluth et al.•The International Journal of Life…•2005

  • Future CO 2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure

    Open Access•Steven J Davis, Ken Caldeira et al.•Science•2010

  • Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target

    Open Access•Dan Tong, Qiang Zhang et al.•Nature•2019

  • Understanding carbon lock-in

    Open Access•Gregory C Unruh•Energy Policy•2000

  • Climate-wise choices in a world of oil abundance

    Open Access•Adam R Brandt, Mohammad S Masnadi et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0.5
Citation span2020 - 2021 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae