Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Legal reasoning

A textual perspective on common law judicial opinions and Chinese judgments

Bibliographic Data

ID15672884
AuthorsNan Lu (0000-0001-5452-3366, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies), Chuanyou Yuan (Guangdong Baiyun University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume41
Issue1
Pages71-93
Publication date2021-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueText and Talk (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1860-7330 • E-ISSN: 1860-7349
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/text-2020-2084
OpenAlexW3125252180
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited6

The issue of legal reasoning has been addressed widely in legal academia and practice, but rarely considered by linguists. This paper, employing the Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) genre perspective and the discourse semantics system as its conceptual framework, attempts to reveal the different ways of legal reasoning of common law judicial opinions and Chinese judgments from a textual perspective. One judicial opinion of a British case and one judgment of a Chinese case are explored for comparison. The findings suggest that Chinese judgments as a legal genre, compared with its counterpart of common law judicial opinions, unfold not in waves construed by multilayered Theme-and-New structure, but in chunks establishing no prediction or consolidation. We argue that this mode of text unfolding in waves is vitally important for readers to follow the judge’s reasoning and construct a sense of fairness and justice. We suggest that the periodicity and the generic structure of common law judicial opinions would be a valuable frame of reference for the Chinese judicial reform on judgments in improving its legal reasoning

Black letter law · Comparative law · Construct (python library · Epistemology · Judicial opinion · Legal formalism · Legal profession · Legal realism · Linguistics · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Private law · Sociology · Theme (computing · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Law · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy · Translation Studies and Practices · Artificial Intelligence

  • Preliminary jury instructing

    Karen Tracy•Text and Talk•2022

  • With or without a purpose? Judges’ appraisal of offenders or their behaviour in six sentencing remarks

    Xin Dai•Text and Talk•2022

  • The Uses of Argument

    Open Access•Stephen Toulmin, Stephen Edelston Toulmin•Uses of Argument•2003

  • Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions

    Frans H Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst•Speech Acts in Argumentative…•1984

  • An Introduction to Functional Grammar

    M A K Halliday, Μ Α Κ Halliday et al.•Introduction to Functional Grammar•2014

  • Evolving systemic functional linguistics

    Open Access•J R Martins•Functional Linguistics•2014

  • On Law and Reason

    Open Access•Aleksander Peczenik, Jaap C Hage•On Law and Reason•1989

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo
Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae