Stages in an online review genre
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15673003 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Taboada (0000-0002-6750-8891, Simon Fraser University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 247-269 |
| Publication date | 2011-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Text and Talk (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1860-7330 • E-ISSN: 1860-7349 |
| Publisher | De Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/text.2011.011 |
| OpenAlex | W1975313616 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 11 |
Genre, from the Systemic Functional Linguistics point of view, refers to the organization of any speech activity in stages, determined by the overall purpose of the genre and by social conventions. In this paper, the SFL approach to genre and register is applied to the genre of online movie reviews. A corpus analysis shows specific stages in the genre: Descriptive stages (in turn, Subject Matter, Plot, Characters and Background) and an obligatory Evaluation stage. Each stage is described in detail, in particular its characteristics and placement in the texts. We then turn to lexicogrammatical characteristics of the two main stages, showing that Description and Evaluation can be distinguished from each other using two features: evaluative words and connectives. Evaluation stages contain significantly more evaluative words. In terms of connectives, Description was shown to contain more temporal markers than Evaluation, whereas Evaluation contains more causal markers, indicating a basic distinction between narration (which tends to necessitate more temporal relations), and comment (which makes more use of cause, result, concession, condition and contrast relations)
Corpus linguistics · Genre analysis · Linguistics · Narrative · Point (geometry · Register (sociolinguistics · Sociology · Subject (documents · Subject matter · Systemic functional linguistics · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Psychology
“I Would Never Take My Pet to Someone I Didn’t Trust … My Pet’s Health Is My Health”
Sunken ships and screaming banshees
Being “geek” in digital communication
Publisher’s Descriptions of Linguistic Books
“I wish we lived here; would be here every week!” – spatiality and mobility in the language of online travel reviews
“Voilà un film original!”
Do consumer critics write differently from professional critics? A genre analysis of online film reviews
Right now versus back then
Was this analysis helpful? A genre analysis of the Amazon.com discourse community and its “most helpful” product reviews
Multiple-viewing stories
Affective stance as positioning in an English-speaking online fan community
Grammaire locale et analyse textuelle
Overlaps in collaboration adjustments
Language, Context, and Text
English Text
Cohesion in English
Longman grammar of spoken and written English
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Rhetorical and thematic patterns in scheduling dialogues
Narrative Analysis
Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations
Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations
Critiquing the critics
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |