Do we want full control? Preferred level for participation in Laleh-zar historic revitalization projects
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15695348 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kimia Motamedi (corresponding author), Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad Bahramjerdi (0000-0001-5761-8141) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2044-1266 • E-ISSN: 2044-1274 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jchmsd-09-2023-0159 |
| OpenAlex | W4411457496 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 42 |
Purpose This research aims to examine the appropriate level of public participation for revitalizing Laleh-zar, a historic street in Tehran. Despite its cultural significance as the city’s former intellectual hub, Laleh-zar is now dominated by electric retail businesses that are reluctant to engage in participatory processes. This study addresses the gap in understanding how participation can be effectively structured in these constraints. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative case study of Laleh-zar used semi-structured interviews with 34 individuals working in the area, and sampling continuing until saturation. Thematic Analysis was used to identify themes, analyzed within a theoretical framework developed through a critical review of relevant academic literature, comparing participation levels with urban planning theories from a participatory perspective. Findings Findings indicate that while the local community acknowledges Laleh-zar’s historical value and supports the preservation of its cultural and tourism functions, their preferred level of participation remains within tokenism, limited to receiving information and providing feedback. Notably, there is a gap between the roles citizens express interest in compared to the roles they are willing to undertake. Moreover, a key barrier to deeper participation is the community’s distrust in the main administrative body, which limits engagement in decision-making processes. Originality/value This study challenges the assumption that higher levels of participation are always ideal. By examining Laleh-zar, it highlights the importance of aligning participation strategies with community capacities and experiences. The findings contribute to sustainable urban heritage management by emphasizing trust and realistic participation frameworks
Citizen journalism · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Distrust · Heritage tourism · Originality · Political science · Public participation · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Value (mathematics · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Public Policy and Administration Research · Urban Planning and Governance
Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning
Communicative Planning
From the kingdom lash to participation
Transformative thinking and urban living labs in planning practice
Advocacy planning
Applying the MOA (motivation-opportunity-ability) model for the evaluation of residents' participation in built heritage rehabilitation
Dynamic integrity
Stakeholder preference mapping
Planning beyond the horizon
Designing effective public participation
Planning Theory's Emerging Paradigm
Community participation in cultural heritage management
Public participation and consensus-building in urban planning from the lens of heritage planning
Institutional stakeholder participation in urban redevelopment in Tehran
Urban conservation in the public eye
Community participation in contemporary urban planning in Cambodia
Who participates and who doesn't? Adapting community participation model for developing countries
A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries
Overcoming inertia for sustainable urban development
Heterogeneity of public participation in urban redevelopment in Chinese cities
Using thematic analysis in psychology
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
"The Science of "Muddling Through
Planning through debate
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Going round the Back? Complex Networks and Informal Action in Local Planning Processes
Situating Communicative Planning Theory
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |