Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tales of a Tool Encounter

Exploring Video Annotation for Doing Media History

Bibliographic Data

ID15711424
AuthorsSusan Aasman (0000-0003-1675-2998, University of Groningen, corresponding author), Liliana Melgar Estrada (0000-0003-2003-4200, University of Amsterdam), Tom Slootweg (0000-0002-5181-8094, Utrecht University), Rob Wegter (University of Groningen)
Year2018
Pages73-87
Publication date2018-12-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVIEW Journal of European Television History and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2213-0969 • E-ISSN: 2213-0969
PublisherNetherlands Institute for Sound and Vision (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.18146/213-0969.2018.jethc154
OpenAlexW4243497308
LanguageEN

This article explores the affordances and functionalities of the Dutch CLARIAH research infrastructure – and the integrated video annotation tool – for doing media historical research with digitised audiovisual sources from television archives. The growing importance of digital research infrastructures, archives and tools, has enticed media historians to rethink their research practices more and more in terms of methodological transparency, tool criticism and reflection. Moreover, also questions related to the heuristics and hermeneutics of our scholarly work need to be reconsidered. The article hence sketches the role of digital research infrastructures for the humanities (in the Netherlands), and the use of video annotation in media studies and other research domains. By doing so, the authors reflect on their own specific engagements with the CLARIAH infrastructure and its tools, both as media historians and co-developers. This dual position greatly determines the possibilities and constraints for the various modes of digital scholarship relevant to media history. To exemplify this, two short case studies – based on a pilot project ‘Me and Myself. Tracing First Person in Documentary History in AV-Collections’ (M&M) – show how the authors deployed video annotation to segment interpretative units of interest, rather than opting for units of analysis common in statistical analysis. The deliberate choice to abandon formal modes of moving image annotation and analysis ensued from a delicate interplay between the desired interpretative research goals, and the integration of tool criticism and reflection in the research design. The authors found that due to the formal and stylistic complexity of documentaries, also alternative, hermeneutic research strategies ought to be supported by digital infrastructures and its tools

Affordance · Annotation · Art · Comparative historical research · Criticism · Data science · Digital media · Epistemology · Hermeneutics · Human–computer interaction · Literature · Political science · Scholarship · Social science · Sociology · Transparency (behavior · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Humanities and Scholarship · Law · Video Analysis and Summarization

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae