Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Importance of Perinatal Follow-Up in the Management of Critical Congenital Heart Diseases

A Pediatric Heart Center Experience

Bibliographic Data

ID15714513
AuthorsHalise Zeynep Genç (0000-0002-6228-6556, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, corresponding author), Demet Oğuz (0000-0003-0727-4875, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi), Mehmet Gümüştaş (0000-0002-4846-5398, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi), Dilek Yavuzcan Öztürk (0000-0001-5270-4294, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi), Kübra Kurt Bilirer (0000-0001-8204-2375, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi), İbrahim Polat (0000-0001-9434-3976, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi), Merih Cetinkaya (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi), Ali Can Hatemi (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi), Erkut Öztürk (0000-0002-1762-3269, Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi)
Year2025
Volume12
Issue6
Pages767-767
Publication date2025-06-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChildren (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/children12060767
PMID40564725
OpenAlexW4411256704
LanguageEN
References cited17

Objectives : In the neonatal period, 25% of cases with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) require surgical or interventional palliative and corrective procedures. Prenatal diagnosis and timely intervention can positively impact neonatal mortality and morbidity. This study evaluated the effects of perinatal follow-up on the management of CCHD. Methods : The study was conducted on term neonates diagnosed with CCHD, who were monitored in the neonatology and pediatric cardiac intensive care unit between 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2024. The cases were categorized into CCHD with prenatal follow-up (Group I), CCHD born without follow-up at our hospital (Group II), and CCHD accepted from external centers (Group III). Neonatal mortality and morbidity outcomes of these cases that underwent surgical or interventional procedures were statistically evaluated. Results : During the study period, there were 280 neonatal cases (50% male). Among these cases, 30% were in Group I ( n = 84), 20% in Group II ( n = 56), and 50% in Group III ( n = 140). The cesarean section rate was higher in Group I compared to the other groups (80% vs. 52% vs. 45%), and the preoperative lactate levels were lower (0.9 vs. 1.7 vs. 2.1). The anatomical diagnoses, ventricular physiology, operation time, and interventional procedure time were similar. After interventional or surgical procedures, morbidity (22% vs. 25% vs. 36%) and mortality rates (6% vs. 9% vs. 18%) were lower in Group I and Group II compared to Group III. Conclusions : All infants diagnosed with CCHD before birth should be delivered in a tertiary heart center, which positively contributes to neonatal mortality and morbidity. More effort is needed to improve prenatal screening programs

Heart disease · Mortality rate · Neonatal intensive care unit · Neonatology · Pregnancy · Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair · Congenital Heart Disease Studies · Coronary Artery Anomalies · Medicine · Internal Medicine · Pediatrics · Surgery

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae