Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris in Primary Maxillary Anterior Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files

An In Vitro Study

Bibliographic Data

ID15715680
AuthorsBalaji Suresh (Saveetha University), Ganesh Jeevanandan (0000-0003-3631-6982, Saveetha University, corresponding author), Vignesh Ravindran (0000-0002-7534-3636, Saveetha University), Mohammed Mashyakhy (0000-0002-8234-8929, Jazan University), Noura Alessa (0000-0002-1354-9807, King Saud University), Ather Ahmed Syed (0000-0002-5278-1385, Jazan University), Suman Panda (0000-0002-1621-8851, Jazan University), Sonu Acharya (0000-0003-1006-1993, Najran University), Ali Ahmed Assiry (Najran University), Prabhadevi C Maganur (0000-0002-0959-2597, Jazan University), Satish Vishwanathaiah (0000-0002-8376-297X, Jazan University)
Year2023
Volume10
Issue5
Pages898-898
Publication date2023-05-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChildren (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/children10050898
PMID37238446
OpenAlexW4377138919
LanguageEN
References cited49

Successful outcome of pulp therapy depends on good chemomechanical preparation of the canals. This is completed with the help of various upcoming rotary and hand files. However, during this preparation, there might be an apical extrusion of the debris which may result in postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the number of debris apically extruded during canal preparation using two different pediatric rotary file systems and conventional hand file systems in primary teeth. 60 primary maxillary central incisors that were extracted due to trauma or untreated dental caries with no signs of resorption were taken. Canal preparation was executed using three different file systems: Group A: Group A hand K file system, Group B Kedo S Plus, Group C Kedo SG Blue. For each of these files using the Myers and Montgomery model, the pre- and post-weight of the eppendorf tube was assessed to quantify the number of apical debris. The maximum extrusion of apical debris was noticed with the Hand K-file system. The least debris was noticed in the Kedo S Plus file system. Statistical analysis revealed that there were highly significant differences in apical extrusion and debris when comparing hand files and rotary files and also between the two rotary files used. Apical debris collection is an unavoidable outcome of canal instrumentation. Among the file systems compared, rotary files had lesser extrusion when compared to hand files. Among the rotary files, Kedo S plus showed normal extrusion compared to SG Blue

Composite material · Debris · Extrusion · File system · Operating system · Root canal · Computer Science · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dentistry · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Materials Science · Medicine · Geology · Orthodontics

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae