Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Orthodontic Management of Class II Malocclusion with Clear Aligners

Mandibular Advancement vs. Class II Elastics

Bibliographic Data

ID15715787
AuthorsElisabetta Cretella Lombardo (Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences), Letizia Lugli (Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences), Roberta Lione (0000-0001-9292-3248, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences), Patrizio Bollero (0000-0003-2430-2057, University of Rome Tor Vergata), Paola Cozza (0000-0003-2663-8291, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences), Chiara Pavoni (0000-0001-6720-1606, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume12
Issue5
Pages562-562
Publication date2025-04-26
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChildren (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/children12050562
PMID40426741
OpenAlexW4410008008
LanguageEN
References cited44

Background : This cephalometric study aimed to evaluate the effects of clear aligner therapy in growing individuals with Class II malocclusion, comparing two functional approaches: the use of Class II elastics or the Mandibular Advancement (MA). Methods : Cephalometric data from 39 patients with Class II malocclusion treated using clear aligners either combined with Class II elastics (EL group; n = 18) or Mandibular Advancement (MA group; n = 21) were analyzed and compared with an untreated control group (UC2; n = 15). Results : Both treatment groups (EL and MA) showed a significant reduction in the ANB angle compared to the control (MA: -1.5°; EL: -2.2°; UC2: +0.2°). An increase in mandibular length, as measured by Co-Gn, was observed in both the EL and MA groups (+5.5 mm and +8.3 mm, respectively) relative to the control group. Soft tissue analysis of the Pg-TVL distance from T1 to T2 revealed the most substantial forward displacement of the chin in the MA group (MA: +2.0 ± 3.7 mm; EL: +0.5 ± 0.7 mm; UC2: -1.6 ± 3.3 mm). Vertically, the MA group exhibited a more marked decrease in the palatal-mandibular plane angle than the other groups. Both treatment modalities significantly reduced overjet and overbite from T1 to T2. Conclusions : The EL and MA appliances effectively advanced the mandible, leading to significant improvements in the sagittal relationship, overjet, and overbite while maintaining stable vertical control. Additionally, the MA group exhibited a more pronounced forward movement of the soft tissue chin

Class (philosophy · Malocclusion · Computer Science · Dentistry · Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques · Medicine · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Orthodontics

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae