Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Randomized Trial of Bioceramic Apical Barrier Methods in Necrotic Immature Incisors

Effects on Pain, Extrusion, and Procedure Duration

Bibliographic Data

ID15716590
AuthorsYasser Alsayed Tolibah (0000-0001-5498-9991, Damascus University), Nada Bshara (0000-0003-0055-6204, Damascus University), Osama Aljabban (0000-0002-6175-6632, Damascus University), Mohammad Tamer Abbara (0000-0003-3664-0248, Damascus University), Marwan Alhaji (0009-0004-2014-309X, Damascus University), Imad‐Addin Almasri (0000-0002-4741-3721, Damascus University), Ziad D Baghdadı (0000-0002-0071-9141, Manitoba Beekeepers' Association, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume12
Issue10
Pages1423-1423
Publication date2025-10-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChildren (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/children12101423
PMID41153605
OpenAlexW4415402709
LanguageEN
References cited49

Objective : This randomized controlled trial evaluated postoperative pain (PP), bioceramic extrusion, and procedure duration in necrotic immature incisors treated with three apical barrier methods (ABMs): Bioceramic Putty Apical Plug (BPAP), Single Cone with Bioceramic Sealer (SBS), and Bioceramic Putty-Sealer Mixture (BPSM). Case-related factors influencing these outcomes were also examined. Methods : Ninety-nine children (8-11 years) with necrotic maxillary incisors and moderate periapical lesions were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to BPAP, SBS, or BPSM groups. Standardized protocols included calcium hydroxide dressing and XP-Endo Finisher irrigation. Pain (VAS) was recorded at 1-, 3-, 7-, and 14-day post-treatment. Extrusion (yes/no) and procedure duration were documented. Regression analyses identified predictors of outcomes. Results : At day 1, pain was highest in the BPAP group (mean 3.5) and lowest in the SBS group (mean 1.05; p p = 0.002). Treatment duration was longest in BPAP (25.8 min) and shortest in SBS (12.6 min; p Conclusions : The apical barrier method had a significant impact on short-term outcomes. SBS offered reduced pain and shorter chair time but carried a higher risk of extrusion, while BPAP minimized extrusion but caused more pain and required more extended visits. Clinical selection should balance patient comfort, apical anatomy, behavior, and operator expertise. Longer-term outcomes on periapical healing remain to be evaluated

Analysis of variance · Bioceramic · Molar · Pain score · Randomization · Randomized controlled trial · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dental Trauma and Treatments · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

  • Evaluation of a Novel Tool for Apical Plug Formation during Apexification of Immature Teeth

    Open Access•Yasser Alsayed Tolibah, Line Droubi et al.•International Journal of…•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae