Effectiveness of Chloral Hydrate on Brain MRI in Children with Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability Comparing with Normal Intelligence
Single Tertiary Center Experience
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15718481 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ja Un Moon (0000-0002-9942-4609, Catholic University of Korea), Ji Yoon Han (0000-0002-4174-5266, Catholic University of Korea, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1097-1097 |
| Publication date | 2021-11-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Children (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067 |
| Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3390/children8121097 |
| PMID | 34943293 |
| OpenAlex | W3217799489 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
Neurodiagnostic investigation requirements are expanding for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in children, especially in those with developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID). Thus, determination of optimal sedatives to achieve successful sedation and immobility without further neurological compromise is important in children with DD/ID. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and adverse reactions of chloral hydrate (CH) for brain magnetic resonance imaging (B-MRI) in children with DD/ID compared to those with normal intelligence (NI). We performed a retrospective chart review of children aged from 1 day to 12 years who required elective sedation using CH for B-MRI. About 730 cases (415 with DD/ID and 315 with NI) of CH sedation were conducted for B-MRI. Children with DD/ID showed a higher failure rate (22%) than did those with NI (6%); additional CH and prolonged sedation time were required. There was no difference in incidence of adverse reactions between DD/ID and NI groups ( p = 0.338). Older or heavier children with DD/ID ( p = 0.036 and p = 0.013, respectively), as well as those diagnosed with epilepsy or neuropsychiatric disorders showed higher risk of sedation failure ( p < 0.001 for each). In conclusion, CH was a suboptimal sedative drug for children with DD/ID compared with those with NI. Other alternative or supplementary sedatives should be taken into consideration especially for those vulnerable groups
Adverse effect · Anesthesia · Chloral hydrate · Epilepsy · Incidence (geometry · Magnetic resonance imaging · Psychiatry · Radiology · Sedation · Sedative · Sedative/hypnotic · Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research · Anesthesia and Sedative Agents · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders · Medicine · Internal Medicine · Pediatrics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |