Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Maternal Group B Streptococcal Rectovaginal Colonization after Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis

Bibliographic Data

ID15719802
AuthorsPing Liu (0000-0002-8713-1999, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Qiaoli Feng (0000-0002-2049-4066, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Yiheng Liang (0000-0003-3259-2365, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Xinxin Wang (0000-0003-4043-1916, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Zhansong Xiao (Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Li-Ting Huang (Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Liting Huang (Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Yun Li (0000-0001-8225-4554, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Yuqing Deng (Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Lin Yu (0000-0003-3448-5213, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Yang Xin (0009-0007-0449-2320, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital), Shang­rong Fan (0000-0002-8672-360X, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume9
Issue12
Pages1848-1848
Publication date2022-11-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChildren (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2227-9067 • E-ISSN: 2227-9067
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/children9121848
PMID36553292
OpenAlexW4310072848
LanguageEN
References cited34

Maternal rectovaginal colonization with Group B Streptococcus (GBS) during labor is a prerequisite for neonatal early-onset GBS disease. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) has been proven to prevent GBS perinatal infection, while there are few studies on the evaluation of the effectiveness of different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. This study aimed to assess the maternal rectovaginal GBS colonization status after IAP, antimicrobial susceptibility and maternal and neonatal outcomes among women administered different antibiotic prophylaxis regimens. A prospective study was conducted between June 2018 and June 2022. GBS carriers identified at 35-37 weeks of gestation were provided IAP (penicillin, cefazolin or clindamycin) at delivery based on the local protocol for GBS prevention. Rectovaginal samples were obtained from participants again after delivery. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in GBS isolates was performed using the broth microdilution method. A total of 295 cases were included in this study. In the postpartum re-examination for GBS, the overall negative rectovaginal culture rate was 90.8% (268/295). Women who received cefazolin prophylaxis had the highest negative culture rate (95.2%, 197/207), which was followed by those who received penicillin (80.7%, 67/83) and clindamycin (80.0%, 4/5) ( p = 0.001). All GBS isolates achieved sensitivity to penicillin and cefazolin, whereas resistance to clindamycin was shown in 21.4% of the strains. There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes among the IAP groups. The use of IAP is highly effective in reducing the maternal rectovaginal GBS colonization. Cefazolin may offer equivalent efficacy and safety compared to standard penicillin prophylaxis

Antibiotic prophylaxis · Antibiotics · Biology · Cefazolin · Clindamycin · Group B · Obstetrics · Penicillin · Streptococcus · Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare · Medicine · Neonatal and Maternal Infections · Streptococcal Infections and Treatments · Internal Medicine · Microbiology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae