Framing responsible innovation in synthetic biology
The need for a critical discourse analysis approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15735842 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fujia Li (0000-0001-9383-8651, University of Exeter, corresponding author), Roger Owens (0000-0002-1767-3901, University of Exeter), Elena Simakova (University of Exeter) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 104-108 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23299460.2014.1002059 |
| OpenAlex | W2054853948 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 24 |
Various framings of responsible innovation, some specific to synthetic biology and others more general, have emerged, evoking notions of responsibility in science and innovation. They are represented by a set of narratives that are far from stabilised, being subject to the ongoing debate and contestation. We aim to understand the emergence of discourses of responsible (research and) innovation and dynamics influencing them. This article proposes a critical discourse analysis approach to gain such understanding
Critical discourse analysis · Discourse analysis · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Framing (construction · Ideology · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Responsible Research and Innovation · Sociology · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Gene Regulatory Network Analysis · Law · Science, Research, and Medicine
What Is “Responsible” about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues
Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields
The past and future of constructive technology assessment
A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation
Institutionally Divided Moral Responsibility
Public uptake of science
Mapping ‘social responsibility’ in science
The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council's commitment to a framework for responsible innovation
Where are the politics in responsible innovation? European governance, technology assessments, and beyond
Real-time technology assessment
Technologies of Humility
Responsible research and innovation
Opening Up" and "Closing Down
The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies
Responsibility and Environmental Governance
| Citations per year | 0.56 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |