Land use conflicts between biomass and power production – citizens’ participation in the technology development of Agrophotovoltaics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 15735872 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Ketzer (0000-0002-8115-2000, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, corresponding author), Nora Weinberger (0000-0002-1148-7470, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Christine Rösch (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Stefanie Seitz (0000-0002-8169-9081, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 193-216 |
| Publication date | 2019-08-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23299460.2019.1647085 |
| OpenAlex | W2970749968 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 31 |
Despite the technical feasibility of renewable energy technologies and their contribution to climate-friendly power production public opposition can be a hurdle for new installations of renewable energy plants. This study assesses citizens’ perceptions of the Agrophotovoltaics (APV) technology by applying the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) concept. APV combines biomass cultivation and solar power production at the same site in order to reduce land use conflict of food vs. energy production. In a workshop, citizens’ perception on APV before building the first pilot plant was investigated to analyze relevant aspects for the innovation process and its framework at an early stage of the technology development process. This paper describes the findings from this workshop focusing on the impact of APV on landscape, biodiversity, economy, and on the requirements for regulatory framework
Business · Civil engineering · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Land use · Natural resource economics · Opposition (politics · Political science · Production (economics · Public participation · Public relations · Renewable energy · Engineering · Environmental Science · Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Photovoltaics in agricultural landscapes
Sustainable and Resilient Agrifood Systems ( Saras ). A Leibniz Position
Synergies and trade-offs of multi-use solar landscapes
Sparking stakeholder support
Agrivoltaics as a win-win for rural regions? Energy and environmental justice perspectives across Italy, Spain, Belgium, and the Netherlands
Feldfrüchte und Strom von Agrarflächen
Social acceptance of dual land use approaches
Responsible innovation ecosystem governance
Necessary conditions for responsible innovation
Responsible innovation scholarship
Responsible business modelling for sustainability transitions
Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions
Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma
Communities matter
The institutional space of community initiatives for renewable energy
A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure
Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives
Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy
Assigning meaning to Nest by technology futures
Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments
Citizens’ willingness to participate in local renewable energy projects
Rethinking Nimbyism
Public participation for infrastructure planning in the context of the German “Energiewende”
Pre- and post-installation community perceptions of wind farm projects
Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland
Systemic innovation and risk
The Social Framework for Projects
Spatial Trade-Offs between Wind Power Production and Bird Collision Avoidance in Agricultural Landscapes
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |